Great ideaEXreaction wrote:Indeed, which is why it may be good just to stick with the big guns, OpenID, Windows Live, Google, Yahoo (if possible). Anyone on Facebook is likely to have an account with at least one of those anyways.
Search found 26 matches
- Fri May 06, 2011 11:41 pm
- Forum: [3.x] Discussion
- Topic: Authentication, Registration and user integration
- Replies: 13
- Views: 34185
Re: Authentication, Registration and user integration
- Tue Aug 24, 2010 8:58 pm
- Forum: [3.x] Discussion
- Topic: Official Bridges
- Replies: 11
- Views: 19466
Re: Official Bridges
In that case, for me it is just as good as included in the core 
Horayyy!!!
Horayyy!!!
- Tue Aug 24, 2010 8:53 pm
- Forum: [3.x] Discussion
- Topic: WYSIWYG editor
- Replies: 104
- Views: 241837
Re: WYSIWYG editor
let's hope for it on 3.1.x or 3.2 
- Tue Aug 03, 2010 6:32 pm
- Forum: [3.x] Discussion
- Topic: Official Bridges
- Replies: 11
- Views: 19466
Re: Official Bridges
And the phpBB teams are actively developing some of these bridges, for example drupal sounds great. :)
Just because they won't be included in the phpBB package does not mean they are not official. So it will be something like prosilver_se? Officially maintained by the team but not included in the ...
Just because they won't be included in the phpBB package does not mean they are not official. So it will be something like prosilver_se? Officially maintained by the team but not included in the ...
- Tue Aug 03, 2010 5:49 pm
- Forum: [3.x] Discussion
- Topic: Official Bridges
- Replies: 11
- Views: 19466
Re: Official Bridges
OK.. thanks
I thought that there is something new behind the announcement. but now it sounds like that the announcement is just an invitation to all MOD authors to write bridge... nothing more.
Sorry for misinterpreting the announcement. :oops:
Now I have to wonder what was the "introducing" is ...
I thought that there is something new behind the announcement. but now it sounds like that the announcement is just an invitation to all MOD authors to write bridge... nothing more.
Sorry for misinterpreting the announcement. :oops:
Now I have to wonder what was the "introducing" is ...
- Tue Aug 03, 2010 9:42 am
- Forum: [3.x] Discussion
- Topic: Official Bridges
- Replies: 11
- Views: 19466
Re: Official Bridges
Oppss.. sorry I miss my point...
What I was trying to suggest is to include it from the main release and can be turn ON/OFF from ACP
Putting a guideline for the bridges MOD is great, don't get me wrong, that alone is highly appreciated, but personally, nothing beats the out of the box feature from ...
What I was trying to suggest is to include it from the main release and can be turn ON/OFF from ACP
Putting a guideline for the bridges MOD is great, don't get me wrong, that alone is highly appreciated, but personally, nothing beats the out of the box feature from ...
- Tue Aug 03, 2010 6:51 am
- Forum: [3.x] Discussion
- Topic: Official Bridges
- Replies: 11
- Views: 19466
Official Bridges
Hi,
Somebody just post that there will be a special place for Bridges MOD http://www.phpbb.com/community/viewtopic.php?f=64&t=2099771
I would like to say that the idea would be better if official bridges is available or at least part of the future plan for phpBB. From our tagline, "creating ...
Somebody just post that there will be a special place for Bridges MOD http://www.phpbb.com/community/viewtopic.php?f=64&t=2099771
I would like to say that the idea would be better if official bridges is available or at least part of the future plan for phpBB. From our tagline, "creating ...
- Wed Jul 28, 2010 11:23 pm
- Forum: [3.x] Discussion
- Topic: More Security regarding Usernames
- Replies: 19
- Views: 26784
Re: More Security regarding Usernames
Let me just say if this is going to be built in with the core there are 2200+ people who would be happy http://www.phpbb.com/customise/db/mod/separate_login_and_user_name/ including me.
As for my personal opinion, i need it in most cases which is why i wanted it out of the box feature
i rest my ...
As for my personal opinion, i need it in most cases which is why i wanted it out of the box feature
i rest my ...
- Wed Jul 28, 2010 10:58 pm
- Forum: [3.x] Discussion
- Topic: WYSIWYG editor
- Replies: 104
- Views: 241837
Re: WYSIWYG editor
The thing with WYSIWYG is not for us (admins and moderators and advance users) it's for our members. Members who are more oriented with WYSIWYG editors. Personally i don't need WYSIWYG for myself. But when i am receiving complaints about the editor from members, that is when the needs arise.
- Wed Jul 28, 2010 10:43 pm
- Forum: [3.x] Discussion
- Topic: [RFC] Topic based permission system
- Replies: 12
- Views: 20409
Re: [RFC] Topic based permission system
I also have situations when i wish there is a permission settings on a topic.
There are times i need to create forum that will contain only one topic just to post something that requires special permission. Though in Most of my cases, password protection on topic would be sufficient.
There are times i need to create forum that will contain only one topic just to post something that requires special permission. Though in Most of my cases, password protection on topic would be sufficient.