Development Discussion Board

It's definitely there.

You can create a subforum hierarchy as deep as you'd like -- there's even a test sub-sub-forum here on Area51.

Name: hook_mail
Rationale: Allows one to set a custom mail handling class (that implements the same functions as the current mail handler) to allow drop-in mail handling changes (for instance, allows one to use a third-party mail service)
Placement: functions_messenger.php
Input arguments: mail ...

How long is a moment?

So perhaps instead of telling us how unacceptable everything is, you should use the opportunity a discussion topic provides you with and actually state what would be an acceptable solution? I do not see how supporting subsilver2 (yet not including it in the standard download package) would be ...

If you are referring to rxu's solution, yes, that is acceptable.

marian0810 wrote:It would also be nice if there was an option to turn this off. I very much prefer it the way it was before 3.0.4 so atm I just comment out those lines in session.php.

Couldn't you just use a date format that doesn't do that?

Hello? What exactly are you doing here if not discussing it publically before it happens? 3.1 has not been released and there is plenty of space here to discuss, just like you are doing? This discussion is occurring after the fact and is causing the RFC to be reconsidered. In a perfect world, it ...

Thing is they've had time, ever since phpBB3 came out. To me the fact that there is a bit more ss2 styles than prosilver styles just means that there was some transitioning from phpBB2 (subsilver) to phpBB3 (prosilver) and during that transition there have been users favoring ss2 just because that ...

Seems pretty even to me and what I would expect, seeing that subsilver was in phpBB2. Based on these numbers I think the decision to remove subsilver2 was a sound one. We do have to move on... I would expect there to be a clear bias towards prosilver unless there were some barriers preventing style ...