Hello Callum,
you can handle rare false positves (I don't have them on my boards.) with redirecting them to a contact form. The contact form can be protected e.g. with CAPTCHA.
Bye Martin
Search found 155 matches
- Wed Jun 27, 2012 7:05 pm
- Forum: [3.x] Discussion
- Topic: "Official" integration with Akismet
- Replies: 97
- Views: 143862
- Wed Jun 27, 2012 3:23 pm
- Forum: [3.x] Discussion
- Topic: "Official" integration with Akismet
- Replies: 97
- Views: 143862
Re: "Official" integration with Akismet
Hello,
usefull HTTP blacklists to prevent forum spam are (in order of efficiency):
Stop Forum Spam
BotScout
Akismet
The problem with HTTP blacklists is that every HTTP blacklist uses an own different API. There is no standard like it is for (most of) DNS blacklists.
For me one bad point for ...
usefull HTTP blacklists to prevent forum spam are (in order of efficiency):
Stop Forum Spam
BotScout
Akismet
The problem with HTTP blacklists is that every HTTP blacklist uses an own different API. There is no standard like it is for (most of) DNS blacklists.
For me one bad point for ...
- Tue Jun 26, 2012 10:01 pm
- Forum: [3.x] Discussion
- Topic: "Official" integration with Akismet
- Replies: 97
- Views: 143862
Re: "Official" integration with Akismet
Hello EXreaction,
it's great to see that you are back! :)
Your MOD/code is a very carefully solution. Which means that moderators have to check every post which has been called to be spam by Akismet. (I hope that I'm right.) I understand this point. But I could imagine that moderators won't like ...
it's great to see that you are back! :)
Your MOD/code is a very carefully solution. Which means that moderators have to check every post which has been called to be spam by Akismet. (I hope that I'm right.) I understand this point. But I could imagine that moderators won't like ...
- Tue Jun 26, 2012 9:01 pm
- Forum: [3.x][Archive] RFCs
- Topic: [RFC] Include mobile style
- Replies: 93
- Views: 125410
Re: [RFC] Include mobile style
Hello,
absolutely +1! It's just state-of-the-art.
Make a combination of:
Add a field/column called style_type to STYLES_TABLE. Use this column in combination with:
Add auto detection for mobile devices (non JS).
Add a new user_setting and board_setting for the mobile style.
Bye Martin
absolutely +1! It's just state-of-the-art.
Make a combination of:
Add a field/column called style_type to STYLES_TABLE. Use this column in combination with:
Add auto detection for mobile devices (non JS).
Add a new user_setting and board_setting for the mobile style.
Bye Martin
- Tue Jun 26, 2012 5:44 pm
- Forum: [3.x] Discussion
- Topic: Related topics
- Replies: 15
- Views: 21716
Re: Related topics
Hello,
+1
Should have a connection to forum search. Automatically additions will not be usefully.
Bye Martin
+1
Should have a connection to forum search. Automatically additions will not be usefully.
Bye Martin
- Sun Jun 17, 2012 8:45 pm
- Forum: [3.x] Rejected RFCs
- Topic: [RFC|Rejected] libmodx
- Replies: 7
- Views: 17408
Re: [RFC|Rejected] libmodx
Hello,
is there a RFC for disallowingMODX based MODs in future? ;)
If dev team want to phase it out then dev team should allow it for Ascraeus for fallback. Then MOD authors will have a chance to migrate their MODs to extensions and to get the nedded skills and experience. And we will see if the ...
is there a RFC for disallowingMODX based MODs in future? ;)
If dev team want to phase it out then dev team should allow it for Ascraeus for fallback. Then MOD authors will have a chance to migrate their MODs to extensions and to get the nedded skills and experience. And we will see if the ...
- Sun Jun 17, 2012 8:37 pm
- Forum: [3.x][Archive] RFCs
- Topic: [RFC] Automated Updating
- Replies: 31
- Views: 92584
Re: [RFC] Automated Updating
Hello David,
it was just a reflection of my long-time MOD author experience. MODs having a lot of replace-with actions are resulting most of problems with phpBB update using the automated update packages. Sometimes a lot of code is destroyed by this. I know how to repair it. But webmasters without ...
it was just a reflection of my long-time MOD author experience. MODs having a lot of replace-with actions are resulting most of problems with phpBB update using the automated update packages. Sometimes a lot of code is destroyed by this. I know how to repair it. But webmasters without ...
- Sun Jun 17, 2012 8:32 pm
- Forum: [3.1/Ascraeus] Merged RFCs
- Topic: [RFC|Merged] AJAX
- Replies: 130
- Views: 289096
Re: [RFC|Merged] AJAX
Hello Callum,
Sorry, I red the whole discussion and could not find any information. Maybe you should add a related advice to the first post in this topic.
Bye Martin
Sorry, I red the whole discussion and could not find any information. Maybe you should add a related advice to the first post in this topic.
Bye Martin
- Sun Jun 17, 2012 7:19 pm
- Forum: [3.1/Ascraeus] Merged RFCs
- Topic: [RFC|Merged] AJAX
- Replies: 130
- Views: 289096
Re: [RFC|Merged] AJAX
Hello,
+1 for the RFC
+1 for inline
I would be nice if a phpBB AJAX documentation for MOD authors would be available then the first beta of Ascraeus is released. So we (MOD athors) will have a chance to use it.
Bye Martin
+1 for the RFC
+1 for inline
I would be nice if a phpBB AJAX documentation for MOD authors would be available then the first beta of Ascraeus is released. So we (MOD athors) will have a chance to use it.
Bye Martin
- Sun Jun 17, 2012 6:37 pm
- Forum: [3.x] Rejected RFCs
- Topic: [RFC|Rejected] libmodx
- Replies: 7
- Views: 17408
Re: [RFC|Rejected] libmodx
Hello Nils,naderman wrote:No longer relevant.
why?
Bye Martin