TBH if I got the wrong impression..
I believe the BBCode system was being developed as all bbcodes as optional, so no defaults any more.. (but that can also be in 4.0)
Search found 362 matches
- Tue Mar 22, 2011 7:56 pm
- Forum: [3.x] Discussion
- Topic: - Ideas for phpBB 3.2 -
- Replies: 25
- Views: 49947
- Sat Mar 12, 2011 4:51 pm
- Forum: [3.x] Rejected RFCs
- Topic: [RFC|Replaced] MOD Installer in 3.1
- Replies: 16
- Views: 45443
Re: [RFC] MOD Installer in 3.1
I'm with DavidIq here.. so a +1 for him :D
But Ithin a transition situation is never easy.. You ahve to change the thinking of the mod dev's and add a bunch of hooks... But by beginning to add the commonly used things (adding hook to common.php etc) makes it easier for all. Of course we cannot add ...
But Ithin a transition situation is never easy.. You ahve to change the thinking of the mod dev's and add a bunch of hooks... But by beginning to add the commonly used things (adding hook to common.php etc) makes it easier for all. Of course we cannot add ...
- Wed Feb 09, 2011 8:58 pm
- Forum: [3.x] Discussion
- Topic: Statuses in phpBB?
- Replies: 5
- Views: 12975
Re: Statuses in phpBB?
huh what do you mean with statuses? phpBB has the possibilities of ranks.. which can indicate who does what? Or do you mean something else?
- Mon Jan 31, 2011 9:23 pm
- Forum: [3.x][Archive] RFCs
- Topic: [RFC] Stop Supporting Subsilver
- Replies: 24
- Views: 38461
Re: [RFC] Stop Supporting Subsilver
then i guess for such users there will be no choice else to get rid of there current style and hope some one build a similar style to work with the new versions :lol:
as it was with the phpBB3 release etc..
Why would 3.2 be any different.. as 2.x => 3.0 was a complete overhaul and not to mention ...
as it was with the phpBB3 release etc..
Why would 3.2 be any different.. as 2.x => 3.0 was a complete overhaul and not to mention ...
- Sun Jan 23, 2011 7:46 pm
- Forum: [3.x] Discussion
- Topic: SEO URLs
- Replies: 94
- Views: 270951
Re: SEO URLs
TBH I don't like the excess of ///// makes the url looks ugly to me...
But I think just adding the topic title and dropping the f= parameters is enough.. Keeps the url nice and clean.. ppl know what the url is linking too..
But I think just adding the topic title and dropping the f= parameters is enough.. Keeps the url nice and clean.. ppl know what the url is linking too..
- Sun Jan 16, 2011 11:50 pm
- Forum: [3.x] Discussion
- Topic: SEO URLs
- Replies: 94
- Views: 270951
Re: SEO URLs
And TBH sooskriszta you say our points are invalid (most of the time) or saying we don't read the entire topic. But sometimes I wonder if you really read our posts and the objections we have.
What do you mean "our" and "we"? What are you, a posse? I don't remember engaging in any sort of ...
What do you mean "our" and "we"? What are you, a posse? I don't remember engaging in any sort of ...
- Fri Jan 14, 2011 11:46 pm
- Forum: [3.x] Discussion
- Topic: SEO URLs
- Replies: 94
- Views: 270951
Re: SEO URLs
Im a bit lost here...
Lots of talk about pretty urls where all the ing.php?mode=reply&f=105&t=35616 stuff is gone...
But now whe want stuff like: funkyboard.com/funky-1/board-subject-1323
To be honest it's just replacing things.. it still contains the id's and in my opinion its no more easier then ...
Lots of talk about pretty urls where all the ing.php?mode=reply&f=105&t=35616 stuff is gone...
But now whe want stuff like: funkyboard.com/funky-1/board-subject-1323
To be honest it's just replacing things.. it still contains the id's and in my opinion its no more easier then ...
- Wed Nov 24, 2010 10:13 pm
- Forum: [3.x][Archive] RFCs
- Topic: [RFC] Infractions System
- Replies: 4
- Views: 14877
Re: [RFC] Infractions System
just for a human reading point of this topic.. (can you bullitise your several points or add some bold/cursive letters?
Like this?
Outcomes/ Objectives :
Allow existing infractions models used by forum admins to remain usable (
Not force much on the admins (links with above)
Make the warning ...
Like this?
Outcomes/ Objectives :
Allow existing infractions models used by forum admins to remain usable (
Not force much on the admins (links with above)
Make the warning ...
- Wed Nov 24, 2010 10:08 pm
- Forum: [3.x] Discussion
- Topic: ACP Notes
- Replies: 3
- Views: 10330
Re: ACP Notes
TBH I think it will reduce the communication between admins, cos they just say simply: "Didn't you read the note I left.", and in my opinion it will just clutter things up, as you need to read everytime the note someone just left.. It would make the operations you want to do fast, way more time ...
- Thu Nov 11, 2010 6:02 pm
- Forum: [3.x] Discussion
- Topic: xenforo, new forum software, great source for ideas
- Replies: 23
- Views: 58088
Re: xenforo, new forum software, great source for ideas
Strategy .
If phpBB is going to be squarely targettted at being the highest-security forum software, then naturally some usability features would not be implemented.
If phpBB wants to be a modern, appealing and addictive forum system from the user's perspective (ie. not from the developer or ...
If phpBB is going to be squarely targettted at being the highest-security forum software, then naturally some usability features would not be implemented.
If phpBB wants to be a modern, appealing and addictive forum system from the user's perspective (ie. not from the developer or ...