Search found 149 matches

by david63
Sun Nov 12, 2017 6:59 pm
Forum: [3.x][Archive] RFCs
Topic: [RFC] Login with email
Replies: 22
Views: 9330

Re: [RFC] Login with email

... and then create a PR for the benefit of all phpBB users
by david63
Fri Nov 03, 2017 7:53 am
Forum: [3.x] Discussion
Topic: Should Usernames include emoji?
Replies: 6
Views: 582

Re: Should Usernames include emoji?

Personally I cannot see any reason as to why you would want an emoji as part of a username and it would mean massive rewrite of the core - how would you create username_clean for example, which is used extensively. I suspect that it would cause more problems than it would solve. If there is a genuin...
by david63
Sun Oct 22, 2017 9:37 am
Forum: [3.x] Discussion
Topic: Indicate who hasn't read a multi-user PM
Replies: 4
Views: 362

Re: Indicate who hasn't read a multi-user PM

I am not sure that there would be an easy way to show who had read it and who had not. Perhaps a mark against the recipients name, or change the recipients colour, or a list below the recipients "read/opened by" - none of which are particularly elegant. And all of this precludes sending a PM to a gr...
by david63
Sun Oct 22, 2017 7:17 am
Forum: [3.x] Discussion
Topic: URL with post number (limits of the feature)
Replies: 7
Views: 1289

Re: URL with post number (limits of the feature)

I must be missing something here - how can you have a link to something that does not exist? If you have deleted the post/topic then that error message is correct - it would be the same if the post was moved to another forum that a user does not have permission for.
by david63
Wed Oct 04, 2017 7:17 am
Forum: [3.x] Discussion
Topic: ACP UX Improvements
Replies: 30
Views: 2585

Re: ACP UX Improvements

well also if it all happened in at once and to include a re-design as well i doubt we would want to release it under the guise of a minor release which would be from your perspective a non-issue in that case. I am not saying that it would be a non issue I am just suggesting that it would make more ...
by david63
Tue Oct 03, 2017 9:15 pm
Forum: [3.x] Discussion
Topic: ACP UX Improvements
Replies: 30
Views: 2585

Re: ACP UX Improvements

@david63 i do no think anyone is saying all of this should happen at once. It does not matter whether it all happens at once or happens piece meal the problems will still be there. In some respects it would probably, from an extension developers perspective, be better if it all happened at the same...
by david63
Tue Oct 03, 2017 10:23 am
Forum: [3.x] Discussion
Topic: ACP UX Improvements
Replies: 30
Views: 2585

Re: ACP UX Improvements

Whatever you end up doing please bear in mind that almost any change (to either core or style) will almost certainly end up "breaking" extensions and that will be a sure fire way to upset both extension developers and board Admins who use/rely on them.
by david63
Fri Sep 15, 2017 6:07 pm
Forum: [3.x] Tickets Discussion
Topic: PHPBB3-14518 One click update - proposal for 3.3
Replies: 19
Views: 8943

Re: PHPBB3-14518 One click update - proposal for 3.3

blackcrack wrote:
Fri Sep 15, 2017 5:31 pm
well.. viewtopic.php?f=81&t=52281
it should be go with the time.. in my opinion..
on Own/Next Cloud works also ..

best regards
Blacky
If you have the solution then you could always create a PR for it.
by david63
Thu Jul 27, 2017 8:49 pm
Forum: [3.x] Discussion
Topic: Reports as UCP module
Replies: 4
Views: 1330

Re: Reports as UCP module

And which administrator would install an extension that he or his moderators don't need? But if was in the core then it would probably have a permission so an Admin could remove the permission if he did not want it, and if it did not have a permission then he could just disable the module - which r...
by david63
Thu Jul 27, 2017 12:12 pm
Forum: [3.x] Discussion
Topic: Reports as UCP module
Replies: 4
Views: 1330

Re: Reports as UCP module

I would guess that point 1 should be fairly easy to achieve with an extension as it is probably only a db query and then a bit of formatting/manipulation of the data.

For point 2 it could be as simple as deleting the report via the above and then creating a new report.