Development Discussion Board

bruce fiction wrote: ↑

Wed Jun 26, 2019 4:53 am

hack with that i'm not downloading a bunch of softwere

Then how do you propose doing anything on your laptop?

Everything that you do requires you to download, and install, software!

The problem with changing the date/time to the approval time is that the post could then be out of sequence and might not make sense in the context of the topic. I do agree though that when a post is approved it should become the first unread post in the topic - there is a similar issue with edited ...

To not do so means any style which had implemented login forms "on additional pages" are now broken in phpBB 3.2.6 and later, and can't fix it through changes to the style. That is not necessarily true. The style author can remove the functionality from the style. I don't believe that it is the res...

Aitisa wrote: ↑

Thu May 09, 2019 10:18 am

What do the -> and => operations mean respectively? It's impossible to google related information so I have to ask it... Thank you very much.

It is not impossible to Google the question, the first result I got is https://stackoverflow.com/questions/140 ... -in-php-or

CheGuevara wrote: ↑

Wed Apr 24, 2019 5:50 am

I meant 7.3. There are no errors.

You may not have encountered them yet but they are there.

Whilst all of this "fancy" scrolling is admirable from a technical perspective, and possibly a challenge in development terms, I think that we are loosing sight at who all of this is aimed at - the end user, not developers, not extension/style creators, not board owners but the end user. Changing ho...

I would suggest that you use the correct terminology as I believe that you are referring to forum not a board.

Board = a number of fora
Forum = a number of topics
Topic = a number of posts

just exspect all to be re-written for 4.0 Just great - let's upset all extension developers and all style developers just because somebody want to change something. The whole point of extensions was supposed to be that they would be backwards compatible with all future versions until the point wher...

In any redesign of modules (ACP, MCP, UCP) is any consideration being given to how extensions currently use modules or are virtually all extensions going to have to be re-written?

Whilst I would not discount any of the above as being potential problems, and I would agree that there are some areas that need blocking, I would ask is this actually a problem in the real world. By that I mean is there any data on users actually having these problems as I cannot recall any support ...