Development Discussion Board

Thanks, and awesome!

I know the snapshots have been up to date, but I'm asking wheteher or not the sourceforge cvs is in sync with developer CVS. This is the difference between having to use the snapshots and being able to use CVS directly to update a local copy.

I noticed that the warning about the manually generated snapshots has disappeared and that I saw 58-something checkins in the last couple of days from the mailing list.

so, has the sourceforge CVS (mirroring*) been fixed?

*I'm just asking about the actual source control system itself, I understand ...

also, since it's looking up the topic anyway (to know what other posts to display) it's fairly trivial to look up the forum as well.

it is practilcally impossible (not to mention inadvisable) to have significant ammounts on uncommited code when the nunmber of developers actualy justifies the use of the word "team".


I agree with statement. However, please entertain the possibility that they may not be using sf.net as the ...

intermittent bug, it's happened before.

Nadrien wrote: But why? It gives the development team something to fix.

the code's not broken, it's not finished. therefore there is nothing to fix.

shroodoo wrote: download a snapshot

for clarity, I believe snapshot = pre-alpha code. i.e. far, far, from being identified as beta.

phpbb3 has been in the development for 283,824,000+ seconds



ok, I was a little confused by this at first. so, for anyone reading that, I think that was supposed to be 28,382,400 based on the "1%" calculation.

328 days is so far off. That's less than a year. phpbb3 (formerly 2.2) has been in ...

downloading a shapshot would be a good way to see.

IF you are an expert in php and mySQL.

to see the features from the code, yes, this woule be true.

however, the snapshot doesn't usually take any more effort to install than 2.0. so, if [s]he has the ability to install a final install, a ...