Search found 8 matches
- Wed Sep 13, 2017 2:16 pm
- Forum: [3.x] Discussion
- Topic: Subfolder system for attachments
- Replies: 26
- Views: 77782
- Mon Jan 16, 2017 7:19 pm
- Forum: [3.x] Discussion
- Topic: [RFC][3.3.x] Supported PHP versions
- Replies: 31
- Views: 132280
Re: [RFC][3.3.x] Supported PHP versions
What are we keep sending stats info from the ACP if then we just jump ship with no good enough explanation?
Can we publish the stats data and see what it tells us?
Otherwise you're just going to have trolls and/or users who have no real understanding about the technology and therefore choosing ...
- Mon Jan 16, 2017 7:16 pm
- Forum: [3.x] Discussion
- Topic: Unsubscribe link in emails
- Replies: 3
- Views: 12694
Re: Unsubscribe link in emails
The user is indeed subscribed to the Admin/board emails by default...
It would also be beneficial to us Canadian's to have some sort of "CASL compliance" feature (similar how there is a COPPA feature) that would give administrators the option to show a selection box on the registration page so ...
It would also be beneficial to us Canadian's to have some sort of "CASL compliance" feature (similar how there is a COPPA feature) that would give administrators the option to show a selection box on the registration page so ...
- Wed Jan 11, 2017 12:00 am
- Forum: [3.x] Discussion
- Topic: [RFC][3.3.x] Supported PHP versions
- Replies: 31
- Views: 132280
Re: [RFC][3.3.x] Supported PHP versions
What are we keep sending stats info from the ACP if then we just jump ship with no good enough explanation?
Can we publish the stats data and see what it tells us?
Otherwise you're just going to have trolls and/or users who have no real understanding about the technology and therefore choosing an ...
Can we publish the stats data and see what it tells us?
Otherwise you're just going to have trolls and/or users who have no real understanding about the technology and therefore choosing an ...
- Thu May 19, 2016 8:39 pm
- Forum: [3.x] Discussion
- Topic: New 3.2.X installer does not work under nginx + PHP7?
- Replies: 4
- Views: 34430
Re: New 3.2.X installer does not work under nginx + PHP7?
Try something like this and see if it helps:
1 # Sample nginx configuration file for phpBB.
2 # Global settings have been removed, copy them
3 # from your system's nginx.conf.
4 # Tested with nginx 0.8.35.
5
6 # If you want to use the X-Accel-Redirect feature,
7 # add the following to your ...
1 # Sample nginx configuration file for phpBB.
2 # Global settings have been removed, copy them
3 # from your system's nginx.conf.
4 # Tested with nginx 0.8.35.
5
6 # If you want to use the X-Accel-Redirect feature,
7 # add the following to your ...
- Wed Dec 10, 2014 4:45 pm
- Forum: [3.1/Ascraeus] Merged RFCs
- Topic: [RFC|Merged] Breadcrumb microdata
- Replies: 26
- Views: 88675
Re: [RFC|Merged] Breadcrumb microdata
I would suggest to stay away from this and release an extension instead. These things change too quickly and shouldn't be part of a the core. This is what happened to the "authorship" markup. https://support.google.com/webmasters/a ... 3347?hl=en
- Wed Dec 10, 2014 4:41 pm
- Forum: [3.1/Ascraeus] Merged RFCs
- Topic: [RFC] Modern profile fields in 3.1
- Replies: 83
- Views: 257069
Re: [RFC] Modern profile fields in 3.1
+1
Removing WLM is a no-brainer. This should be done ASAP.
Deciding which ones to add is a bit more difficult. Facebook does not make much sense in most cases imo. Twitter on the other hand, +1.
That's why I came out with this:
https://www.phpbb.com/community/viewtopic.php?f=70&t=2261076
WLM ...
Removing WLM is a no-brainer. This should be done ASAP.
Deciding which ones to add is a bit more difficult. Facebook does not make much sense in most cases imo. Twitter on the other hand, +1.
That's why I came out with this:
https://www.phpbb.com/community/viewtopic.php?f=70&t=2261076
WLM ...
- Wed Dec 10, 2014 4:31 pm
- Forum: [3.1/Ascraeus] Merged RFCs
- Topic: [RFC] Template system: alternative syntax for DEFINE
- Replies: 13
- Views: 52540
Re: Template system: alternative syntax for DEFINE
+1 for the OP idea.
Slightly off topic. Would this be considered for 3.0.x? Maybe open a ticket?
Slightly off topic. Would this be considered for 3.0.x? Maybe open a ticket?