Search found 23 matches
- Sat Aug 02, 2014 9:01 am
- Forum: [3.x][Archive] RFCs
- Topic: [RFC] use date type DBMS field for type_date custom profile fields
- Replies: 9
- Views: 27928
Re: [RFC] use date type DBMS field for type_date custom profile fields
MySQL - http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.1/en/datetime.html MSSQL - http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb630352.aspx Oracle - http://docs.oracle.com/cd/B19306_01/server.102/b14225/ch4datetime.htm#i1005983 SQLite - http://www.sqlite.org/datatype3.html PostgreSQL - http://www.postgresql.org/docs...
- Fri Aug 01, 2014 7:46 pm
- Forum: [3.x][Archive] RFCs
- Topic: [RFC] use date type DBMS field for type_date custom profile fields
- Replies: 9
- Views: 27928
Re: [RFC] use date type DBMS field for type_date custom profile fields
They are. I have checked them all. This is the standard date format for all used DBMSs.
- Thu Jul 31, 2014 8:42 pm
- Forum: [3.x][Archive] RFCs
- Topic: [RFC] use date type DBMS field for type_date custom profile fields
- Replies: 9
- Views: 27928
Re: [RFC] use date type DBMS field for type_date custom profile fields
No. The sentences are not contradictory to each other.
For the moment the date is saved as VARCHAR 10 in the format of DD-MM-YYYY regardless of the server local. The date type field format is YYYY-MM-DD.
The date is formed by PHP function create_date or make_date (I don't remember exactly).
For the moment the date is saved as VARCHAR 10 in the format of DD-MM-YYYY regardless of the server local. The date type field format is YYYY-MM-DD.
The date is formed by PHP function create_date or make_date (I don't remember exactly).
- Wed Jul 30, 2014 7:08 am
- Forum: [3.x][Archive] RFCs
- Topic: [RFC] use date type DBMS field for type_date custom profile fields
- Replies: 9
- Views: 27928
Re: [RFC] use date type DBMS field for type_date custom profile fields
I don't know on MSSQL, but on MySQL/MariaDB its 0000 when there is error.
The PR I've submited works with all DBMS-es currently supported by phpBB ...
The PR I've submited works with all DBMS-es currently supported by phpBB ...
- Thu Jul 24, 2014 12:36 pm
- Forum: [3.x][Archive] RFCs
- Topic: [RFC] use date type DBMS field for type_date custom profile fields
- Replies: 9
- Views: 27928
Re: [RFC] use date type DBMS field for type_date custom profile fields
YYYY-MM-DD is the default supported format for dates for all DBMS-es supported by phpBB.
There is one more point in favour of date type field - there is support for date wothout year.
There is one more point in favour of date type field - there is support for date wothout year.
- Tue Jul 08, 2014 3:25 pm
- Forum: [3.x][Archive] RFCs
- Topic: Refactoring user search to allow search/filter by custom fields
- Replies: 21
- Views: 44556
Re: Refactoring user search to allow search/filter by custom fields
Related: https://area51.phpbb.com/phpBB/viewtopi ... 08&t=45879
I've started working on the date type.
I've started working on the date type.
- Mon Jul 07, 2014 8:58 am
- Forum: [3.x][Archive] RFCs
- Topic: [RFC] use date type DBMS field for type_date custom profile fields
- Replies: 9
- Views: 27928
[RFC] use date type DBMS field for type_date custom profile fields
Hello all, As I am in process of creating a PR for using Date type Data Base column for type_date custom profile filed, I was directed to put this RFC so we can discuss it. State now: Custom profile field type date uses for storage Varchar with length of 10 characters DB column. This allows board to...
- Thu Apr 24, 2014 4:43 pm
- Forum: [3.x][Archive] RFCs
- Topic: Refactoring user search to allow search/filter by custom fields
- Replies: 21
- Views: 44556
Re: Refactoring user search to allow search/filter by custom fields
I can do conversion only for the forum I administrate. But the date custom field is of type dd-mm-yyyy I think I is hardly defined.
- Thu Apr 24, 2014 10:23 am
- Forum: [3.x][Archive] RFCs
- Topic: Refactoring user search to allow search/filter by custom fields
- Replies: 21
- Views: 44556
Re: Refactoring user search to allow search/filter by custom fields
Rofl ... that is a fair point ...
But you only get negative timestamp.
But you only get negative timestamp.
- Wed Apr 23, 2014 5:08 am
- Forum: [3.x][Archive] RFCs
- Topic: Refactoring user search to allow search/filter by custom fields
- Replies: 21
- Views: 44556
Re: Refactoring user search to allow search/filter by custom fields
I can write a migration script ... Something along the lines of: Get all field names for type date For each of them do the following: Change name to some hash (so we don't duplicate it) Create new column with type int. Start converting old dates to unix timestamp and write them to the new column Dro...