Search found 83 matches

by Volksdevil
Tue Aug 18, 2015 12:54 am
Forum: [3.x] Style Development
Topic: Which IE versions should we kill?
Replies: 98
Views: 385926

Re: Which IE versions should we kill?

Stop downloading so many toolbars yuo!!!!11111 :lol: :lol: I run my PC at an absolute minimum, zero toolbars! I'm a bit OCD like that. :oops: But yeah, all this browser stuff certainly is subjective. Some will favor 'X', some will favor 'Y'. My own experience of using Chrome since its birth is that...
by Volksdevil
Tue Aug 18, 2015 12:27 am
Forum: [3.x] Style Development
Topic: Which IE versions should we kill?
Replies: 98
Views: 385926

Re: Which IE versions should we kill?

It may use a lot of RAM, but as said: RAM exists for a reason: if your computer can store lots of stuff in its short-term memory, then it can recall those things quickly later on. And if your computer doesn’t end up needing that stuff, it will toss it away to make room for other programs that need t...
by Volksdevil
Mon Aug 17, 2015 4:16 pm
Forum: [3.x] Style Development
Topic: Which IE versions should we kill?
Replies: 98
Views: 385926

Re: Which IE versions should we kill?

I'm not wrong, I'm sharing my own experience of using said product. It's OK everybody here saying I haven't kept up with development...I shouldn't have to. The average user simply uses the browser (IE Version whatever) and should expect it to work well. In my experience it does not. Whenever I have...
by Volksdevil
Mon Jun 22, 2015 4:19 pm
Forum: [3.x] Style Development
Topic: Which IE versions should we kill?
Replies: 98
Views: 385926

Re: Which IE versions should we kill?

I'm not wrong, I'm sharing my own experience of using said product. It's OK everybody here saying I haven't kept up with development...I shouldn't have to. The average user simply uses the browser (IE Version whatever) and should expect it to work well. In my experience it does not. Whenever I have ...
by Volksdevil
Thu Jun 18, 2015 3:38 pm
Forum: [3.x] Style Development
Topic: Which IE versions should we kill?
Replies: 98
Views: 385926

Re: Which IE versions should we kill?

Kill all I.E! It's been dragging its heels for way too long IMO. Not true at all—the IE team have been doing great things recently. They've become more transparent with development and they're taking and implementing suggestions , the most noticeable of which is that they've turned on automatic upd...
by Volksdevil
Mon May 25, 2015 5:39 pm
Forum: [3.x] Style Development
Topic: Which IE versions should we kill?
Replies: 98
Views: 385926

Re: Which IE versions should we kill?

Kill all I.E! It's been dragging its heels for way too long IMO.
by Volksdevil
Tue Mar 17, 2015 3:37 am
Forum: [3.x] Discussion
Topic: phpBB 3.1 load
Replies: 34
Views: 77681

Re: phpBB 3.1 load

A lot of this is way over my head, but I certainly found 3.1.x to be a lot slower than 3.0.12 as soon as I upgraded. It only got worse with extensions etc, but I think I'm definitely back down to an acceptable speed now with lots of tweaking/better host/cloudflare. If the coming updates speed things...
by Volksdevil
Tue Mar 17, 2015 3:27 am
Forum: [3.1/Ascraeus] Merged RFCs
Topic: [RFC] Override Language via URL
Replies: 34
Views: 106527

Re: [RFC] Override Language via URL

I'm all for more audience coverage when it comes to language, but extra parameters bother me. Unless they won't have any negative effect? (Thinking of being indexed/multiple url's etc)
by Volksdevil
Tue Mar 17, 2015 3:20 am
Forum: [3.x] Discussion
Topic: Missing icon image.....?
Replies: 15
Views: 33256

Re: Missing icon image.....?

Really glad to hear that Font Awesome will definitely be included! I've been using it from way back on 3.0.x.
by Volksdevil
Thu Feb 26, 2015 2:36 am
Forum: [3.x] Discussion
Topic: Biggest competition threats to PHPBB forums
Replies: 71
Views: 147489

Re: Biggest competition threats to PHPBB forums

I'd just like to add that having a like/dislike feature would be nice, as long as there is some form of control via ACP. It may not be a good idea for certain forum categories etc.