I have guests as can see the forum set to Yes.
See PHPBB3-13913, status is unverified fix
Search found 15 matches
- Tue Jun 09, 2015 3:01 pm
- Forum: [3.x] Discussion
- Topic: Topic title in private forum
- Replies: 8
- Views: 13207
- Wed Jun 03, 2015 5:29 am
- Forum: [3.x] Discussion
- Topic: Topic title in private forum
- Replies: 8
- Views: 13207
Re: Topic title in private forum
Done.DavidIQ wrote:Looks like maybe you'll need to create two tickets now.
- Tue Jun 02, 2015 8:24 pm
- Forum: [3.x] Discussion
- Topic: Topic title in private forum
- Replies: 8
- Views: 13207
Re: Topic title in private forum
When you visit https://tracker.phpbb.com/ and sign in you'll find a distinctly colored Create button in the navigation bar
Thanks, never looked that closely as I couldn't search and didn't want to create another ticket if one already exists.
is there something wrong with the tracker's search ...
Thanks, never looked that closely as I couldn't search and didn't want to create another ticket if one already exists.
is there something wrong with the tracker's search ...
- Tue Jun 02, 2015 7:18 pm
- Forum: [3.x] Discussion
- Topic: Topic title in private forum
- Replies: 8
- Views: 13207
Topic title in private forum
The topic title in a private forum that's in a category within a category is showing on index, don't know if this is known, couldn't search in the tracker and not quite sure how to submit a ticket either.
Cat 1
Cat 2
Private forum
index viewforum
Cat 1
Cat 2
Private forum
index viewforum
- Tue May 13, 2014 6:27 am
- Forum: [3.x] Tickets Discussion
- Topic: [RFC] Ability to @mention specific users in posts
- Replies: 241
- Views: 498392
Re: [RFC] Ability to @mention specific users in posts
People probably use @name instead of quoting, I imagine they do know it doesn't work, but it's quick and to the point.VSE wrote:Does everybody know @mentions do not work in phpBB?
Quoting while replying is what a large minority don't know is possible I reckon.
- Tue Apr 29, 2014 8:45 am
- Forum: [3.x][Archive] RFCs
- Topic: Alter Last Post layout
- Replies: 8
- Views: 25647
Re: Alter Last Post layout
Of course it would have to be wider, bit silly limiting everyone to 5 letter usernames it was just an example image (hence the 'eg') - All moot now anyway.
- Mon Apr 28, 2014 8:23 am
- Forum: [3.x][Archive] RFCs
- Topic: Alter Last Post layout
- Replies: 8
- Views: 25647
Re: Alter Last Post layout
I fought for them to not change the column widths when they did... I liked the layout in 3.0. But I lost that fight
I see, didn't realise it had already been discussed. So it's a dead in the water idea :mrgreen:
What if the username is long?
The idea was to have the area widened.
If the Last ...
I see, didn't realise it had already been discussed. So it's a dead in the water idea :mrgreen:
What if the username is long?
The idea was to have the area widened.
If the Last ...
- Sun Apr 27, 2014 4:06 pm
- Forum: [3.x][Archive] RFCs
- Topic: Alter Last Post layout
- Replies: 8
- Views: 25647
Alter Last Post layout
Alot of forums tend to use just the one line for a description of a forum which now leaves a white space underneath
gap.png
If the Last post area was widened (plenty of space in the middle) and the layout altered slightly the space wouldn't have to be there.
eg:
gap2.png
No biggie, just more ...
gap.png
If the Last post area was widened (plenty of space in the middle) and the layout altered slightly the space wouldn't have to be there.
eg:
gap2.png
No biggie, just more ...
- Thu Apr 24, 2014 7:04 pm
- Forum: [3.x] Discussion
- Topic: Releasing 3.1.0-b3
- Replies: 15
- Views: 24080
Re: Releasing 3.1.0-b3
With 3.0.12 files, I tried again in a live environment with 3.0.12 uploaded by ftp and got the same resultsNeilUK wrote: Surely Quickinstall isn't ready for 3.1 yet? The mod page says it's only for 3.0.11
Files used On a side note: No IP for anonymous user, is this correct?
- Thu Apr 24, 2014 5:53 pm
- Forum: [3.x] Discussion
- Topic: Releasing 3.1.0-b3
- Replies: 15
- Views: 24080
Re: Releasing 3.1.0-b3
I used Quickinstall and XAMPPnickvergessen wrote:I am unable to reproduce that, did you use a b2 board instead of 3.0.12?