Locking Forums?
Forum rules
Please do not post any "phpBB" specific topics here unless they do not fit into the category above.
Do not post bug reports, feature or support requests! No really... Do not post bug reports, feature or support requests! Doing so will make Bertie a very sad bear indeed. :(
Please do not post any "phpBB" specific topics here unless they do not fit into the category above.
Do not post bug reports, feature or support requests! No really... Do not post bug reports, feature or support requests! Doing so will make Bertie a very sad bear indeed. :(
-
- Registered User
- Posts: 112
- Joined: Wed Mar 06, 2002 5:29 pm
- Location: Mobile, Alabama
- Contact:
Turn off the flood control for a couple of hours.
http://visualintensity.com" target="_blank · http://skaboodle.com" target="_blank
-
- Registered User
- Posts: 247
- Joined: Sun Oct 28, 2001 9:47 am
- Location: utrecht, the netherlands
- Contact:
[quotec928b="SamG"][quotec928b="wanrecords"][quotec928b="SHS`"]It's still 337 pages shorter than it should have been come phpBB2.0 launch. [/quotec928b]
true enough. maybe we can still do that for the 2.2 launch? [/quotec928b]
Now [bc928b]that's[/bc928b] an idea!
We can't slack, because psoTFX said (knowing full well he'd regret saying so later ) that it would be a relatively short amount of time between 2.0 and 2.2, so it'd be wise not to be thinking we've got a year to do this.[/quotec928b]
hmm... relatively short can still mean 12 months, since they took 13 months to finish 2.0
true enough. maybe we can still do that for the 2.2 launch? [/quotec928b]
Now [bc928b]that's[/bc928b] an idea!
We can't slack, because psoTFX said (knowing full well he'd regret saying so later ) that it would be a relatively short amount of time between 2.0 and 2.2, so it'd be wise not to be thinking we've got a year to do this.[/quotec928b]
hmm... relatively short can still mean 12 months, since they took 13 months to finish 2.0
[quoteb9898="wanrecords"][quoteb9898="SamG"][quoteb9898="wanrecords"][quoteb9898="SHS`"]It's still 337 pages shorter than it should have been come phpBB2.0 launch. [/quoteb9898]
true enough. maybe we can still do that for the 2.2 launch? [/quoteb9898]
Now [bb9898]that's[/bb9898] an idea!
We can't slack, because psoTFX said (knowing full well he'd regret saying so later ) that it would be a relatively short amount of time between 2.0 and 2.2, so it'd be wise not to be thinking we've got a year to do this.[/quoteb9898]
hmm... relatively short can still mean 12 months, since they took 13 months to finish 2.0 [/quoteb9898]
There are apparently three classes of thinkers who like to parse words. I used to think there were only two -- theologians and politicians. Now (sigh), I have to add geeks.
true enough. maybe we can still do that for the 2.2 launch? [/quoteb9898]
Now [bb9898]that's[/bb9898] an idea!
We can't slack, because psoTFX said (knowing full well he'd regret saying so later ) that it would be a relatively short amount of time between 2.0 and 2.2, so it'd be wise not to be thinking we've got a year to do this.[/quoteb9898]
hmm... relatively short can still mean 12 months, since they took 13 months to finish 2.0 [/quoteb9898]
There are apparently three classes of thinkers who like to parse words. I used to think there were only two -- theologians and politicians. Now (sigh), I have to add geeks.
"I hate trolls!" - Willow Ufgood
-
- Registered User
- Posts: 247
- Joined: Sun Oct 28, 2001 9:47 am
- Location: utrecht, the netherlands
- Contact:
[quote4e1c3="SamG"][quote4e1c3="wanrecords"][quote4e1c3="SamG"][quote4e1c3="wanrecords"][quote4e1c3="SHS`"]It's still 337 pages shorter than it should have been come phpBB2.0 launch. [/quote4e1c3]
true enough. maybe we can still do that for the 2.2 launch? [/quote4e1c3]
Now [b4e1c3]that's[/b4e1c3] an idea!
We can't slack, because psoTFX said (knowing full well he'd regret saying so later ) that it would be a relatively short amount of time between 2.0 and 2.2, so it'd be wise not to be thinking we've got a year to do this.[/quote4e1c3]
hmm... relatively short can still mean 12 months, since they took 13 months to finish 2.0 [/quote4e1c3]
There are apparently three classes of thinkers who like to parse words. I used to think there were only two -- theologians and politicians. Now (sigh), I have to add geeks.[/quote4e1c3]
true enough. maybe we can still do that for the 2.2 launch? [/quote4e1c3]
Now [b4e1c3]that's[/b4e1c3] an idea!
We can't slack, because psoTFX said (knowing full well he'd regret saying so later ) that it would be a relatively short amount of time between 2.0 and 2.2, so it'd be wise not to be thinking we've got a year to do this.[/quote4e1c3]
hmm... relatively short can still mean 12 months, since they took 13 months to finish 2.0 [/quote4e1c3]
There are apparently three classes of thinkers who like to parse words. I used to think there were only two -- theologians and politicians. Now (sigh), I have to add geeks.[/quote4e1c3]