Name of the new style

Discuss requests for comments/changes posted in the Issue Tracker for the development of phpBB's style.
Forum rules
Please do not post support questions regarding installing, updating, or upgrading phpBB or modifying styles of released phpBB versions. If you need support for phpBB please visit the Support Forums on

If you have questions regarding creating styles please post in Styles Support & Discussion to receive proper guidance from our staff and community.
User avatar
Registered User
Posts: 434
Joined: Fri Apr 23, 2010 10:18 am

Re: Name of the new style

Post by Meis2M »



User avatar
Registered User
Posts: 71
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2011 4:42 am
Location: Germany

Re: Name of the new style

Post by canonknipser »

"Names are just sound and smoke" from the german proverb "Namen sind nur Schall und Rauch"
Frank support team member - no support via PM or mail
English is not my native language
Extensions and scripts for phpBB

Registered User
Posts: 48
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 10:47 am

Re: Name of the new style

Post by Rhino.Freak »


Registered User
Posts: 14
Joined: Wed Dec 07, 2016 10:05 pm

Re: Name of the new style

Post by v12mike »

After ignoring it for 2 years, I have just been reading most of the posts here about the new style and its framework.

It seems obvious to me that the new style does need a name, to move it from the abstract to the concrete, and to make searching/indexing of posts here somewhat easier.

It does not really matter what the name is, but as we have not (as far as I can see) settled on a design, the name should not try to descriptive of what it looks like. As this will become the base style for many other styles, it should have a name with a little gravitas.

I will toss in a proposed name of Obsidian.

User avatar
Registered User
Posts: 385
Joined: Fri Apr 04, 2014 12:32 am

Re: Name of the new style

Post by Louis7777 »

It's 2018. Let's name it "offended" or "whiteblackyellow" style, for diversity.

User avatar
Front-End Dev Team Lead
Front-End Dev Team Lead
Posts: 916
Joined: Sat Dec 25, 2010 9:02 pm

Re: Name of the new style

Post by hanakin »

the overall design has a lot to do with the name we choose. As we have not yet started to work on the overall design/colors/etc its way to early to really settle on anything. We have a codename for that aspect of the project internally that we have been using for sometime now. However, for all the recent work that I have accomplished, It's not really intended as the theme or design. It is just the code/UI/structure/framework at this point and I did not want to confuse people by referring to it by the same name. A codename is at most the best we could hope for until we start working on the theme layer for the final version. With that being said keep them coming but think in of both a project codename for the dev side and the name for the theme side as it might help to differentiate.
Donations welcome via Paypal Image

User avatar
Registered User
Posts: 304
Joined: Mon Feb 07, 2005 7:23 am
Location: Lancashire, UK

Re: Name of the new style

Post by david63 »

Why does the style have to have a "fancy" name? Just call it "default" that way everyone knows what they are talking about and it will make support easier than constantly saying "the default xxxxxx style"
Remember: You only know what you know -
and you do not know what you do not know!

Registered User
Posts: 1
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2018 11:33 pm

Re: Name of the new style

Post by Xakep_SDK »


User avatar
Registered User
Posts: 20
Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2016 9:59 pm

Re: Name of the new style

Post by Joyce&Luna »

To give a name to the style will only do something if you know what it looks like.
Are there pictures already?
My contributions are translated from German to English by google. This can lead to misunderstanding.

Registered User
Posts: 15
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:58 pm

Re: Name of the new style

Post by GanstaZ »

I agree with David about default as style name. There are some examples in this forum and seems that those are based on prosilver colors.

Post Reply