
naderman wrote:Empty post subjects are rather uncommon, and I think having Re: in there just makes it clearer that it's a reply to something and not a new topic. So all in all, I think it makes more sense to use the last post subject, and it also simplifies things since we already store it anyway. So I think rather than spending time figuring out some new way to get access to the topic title, we should just stick to last post subject.

imkingdavid wrote:naderman wrote:Empty post subjects are rather uncommon, and I think having Re: in there just makes it clearer that it's a reply to something and not a new topic. So all in all, I think it makes more sense to use the last post subject, and it also simplifies things since we already store it anyway. So I think rather than spending time figuring out some new way to get access to the topic title, we should just stick to last post subject.
Any input on what to do with an empty subject line? There is another RFC for either requiring a minimum length of a subject (as we already do for topic titles, so why not subjects?) or even just doing away with post subjects altogether (or to some extent, see posts in that RFC), which would take care of the problem in one way or another.
ecwpa wrote:Getting rid of replies titles make sense.
ecwpa wrote:However in my particular case I use them on my frontpage for news updates on a news thread already posted. This is probably pretty uncommon I guess but I would like to hear an alternative.
ecwpa wrote:I'm not sure if the topic tags is being considered but that sounds like a good option for me.

Oleg wrote:I think I have warmed up to the idea of displaying the last post's title and if it is empty, displaying nothing (there should still be a link to jump to the last post and last poster's name, as we presently have).


Return to [3.1/Ascraeus] Merged RFCs
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests