[RFC|Merged] Require PHP 5.3

These requests for comments/change have lead to an implemented feature that has been successfully merged into the 3.1/Ascraeus branch. Everything listed in this forum will be available in phpBB 3.1.
Post Reply
User avatar
Erik Frèrejean
Registered User
Posts: 207
Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2007 2:25 pm
Location: surfnet
Contact:

Re: [RFC] Require PHP 5.3

Post by Erik Frèrejean »

naderman wrote:The way I see this is the following: We want to finish 3.1 as soon as possible. Extensions need to be finished to release 3.1. Extensions would be easier and quicker to implement fully if we could use third party components for them. Third party components we would like to use for extensions require PHP 5.3. So let's just require PHP 5.3, to get 3.1 done already, so we can move on.
Which libraries are you thinking of?
Oleg wrote:If that is the case it seems perfectly ok to me to require 5.3. Any hosts still using 5.2 must either compile it themselves or use unofficial packages; in either case it is legitimate to ask them to provide 5.3.
Therefore
Erik Frèrejean wrote:
igorw wrote:At this point it just doesn't make sense to support PHP 5.2.
What percentage of phpBB boards run PHP 5.3?
We have a nice statistics thingy. How large is the user base that still runs 5.2? Breaking backwards compatibility shouldn't be taken to light hearted, how many users will be affected by this and does the potential gain outweigh the size of the user base that is still on that platform.
Available on .com
Support Toolkit developer

igorw
Registered User
Posts: 500
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 11:47 pm

Re: [RFC] Require PHP 5.3

Post by igorw »

Erik Frèrejean wrote:Which libraries are you thinking of?
igorw wrote:Use Symfony2 EventDispatcher instead of copy-paste maintaining the code base (see this PR)
Oleg wrote:We could use event dispatcher verbatim and I think a dependency injection container along with an asset management contraption would be handy as well.
Erik Frèrejean wrote:We have a nice statistics thingy. How large is the user base that still runs 5.2? Breaking backwards compatibility shouldn't be taken to light hearted, how many users will be affected by this and does the potential gain outweigh the size of the user base that is still on that platform.
Someone with access (i.e. management) would have to run some queries again. Last time we did, most (around 80-90%) new installations were on PHP <=5.2. It may have improved a bit by now, but I'm guessing not much. I have already given my opinion on the matter.

User avatar
Erik Frèrejean
Registered User
Posts: 207
Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2007 2:25 pm
Location: surfnet
Contact:

Re: [RFC] Require PHP 5.3

Post by Erik Frèrejean »

igorw wrote:
Erik Frèrejean wrote:We have a nice statistics thingy. How large is the user base that still runs 5.2? Breaking backwards compatibility shouldn't be taken to light hearted, how many users will be affected by this and does the potential gain outweigh the size of the user base that is still on that platform.
Someone with access (i.e. management) would have to run some queries again. Last time we did, most (around 80-90%) new installations were on PHP <=5.2. It may have improved a bit by now, but I'm guessing not much. I have already given my opinion on the matter.
If that is indeed the case I'm sorry to say that this is a no-brainer, you just can't defend breaking compatibility for such a large part of your user base.
igorw wrote:
Erik Frèrejean wrote:Which libraries are you thinking of?
igorw wrote:Use Symfony2 EventDispatcher instead of copy-paste maintaining the code base (see this PR)
As far as I can see is that 5.2 compatible.
Available on .com
Support Toolkit developer

igorw
Registered User
Posts: 500
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 11:47 pm

Re: [RFC] Require PHP 5.3

Post by igorw »

Erik Frèrejean wrote:As far as I can see is that 5.2 compatible.
No. The symfony1 EventDispatcher Component is 5.2 compatible. The Symfony2 EventDispatcher is not. Using something from 2 years ago that has a newer, better, and more maintained version just doesn't make sense.

User avatar
Erik Frèrejean
Registered User
Posts: 207
Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2007 2:25 pm
Location: surfnet
Contact:

Re: [RFC] Require PHP 5.3

Post by Erik Frèrejean »

igorw wrote:
Erik Frèrejean wrote:As far as I can see is that 5.2 compatible.
No. The symfony1 EventDispatcher Component is 5.2 compatible. The Symfony2 EventDispatcher is not. Using something from 2 years ago that has a newer, better, and more maintained version just doesn't make sense.
Okay, thats my mistake. I looked at the one on the components page (http://components.symfony-project.org/event-dispatcher/), which apparently is a different one.
Available on .com
Support Toolkit developer

igorw
Registered User
Posts: 500
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 11:47 pm

Re: [RFC] Require PHP 5.3

Post by igorw »

If we keep supporting old stuff it will live on forever. Just look at IE6.

User avatar
Erik Frèrejean
Registered User
Posts: 207
Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2007 2:25 pm
Location: surfnet
Contact:

Re: [RFC] Require PHP 5.3

Post by Erik Frèrejean »

There is a difference between "forever", and supporting it as long the fast majority still uses it.
Available on .com
Support Toolkit developer

User avatar
imkingdavid
Registered User
Posts: 1050
Joined: Thu Jul 30, 2009 12:06 pm

Re: [RFC] Require PHP 5.3

Post by imkingdavid »

Erik Frèrejean wrote:There is a difference between "forever", and supporting it as long the fast majority still uses it.
Generally, the vast* majority will still use it until they are required to upgrade, imo.
I do custom MODs. PM for a quote!
View My: MODs | Portfolio
Please do NOT contact for support via PM or email.
Remember, the enemy's gate is down.

User avatar
Jacob
Registered User
Posts: 102
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2012 1:41 pm

Re: [RFC] Require PHP 5.3

Post by Jacob »

PHP 5.3 was released in june 2009, more or less like IE8. If we think IE7 is outdated we could make the same assumption about PHP 5.2, I guess.

It's true that a lot of hosts still deploy php 5.2 and 5.1 (Centos 5, Debian 5...), and they will still do in the future as long as people don't ask them to update.

I say, make an announcement now and give hosts a few months to update (you -meaning manage team or whoever- could even talk in private with a few of them if you have the possibility). Tell admins they need to poke their hosts (or update themselves). phpBB is not the center of the world but I honestly think lots os hosts will prefer to update than listen to the complaints/requests of forum users. When a considerable ammount of them had updated the others will need to follow.

I don't think this is an unreasonable request. It certainly is a step ahead.

User avatar
naderman
Consultant
Posts: 1727
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2004 2:11 am
Location: Berlin, Germany
Contact:

Re: [RFC] Require PHP 5.3

Post by naderman »

Stats for 3.0.10 to date:

Code: Select all

4.3: <  1.0%
4.4:    2.5%
5.0: <  1.0%
5.1:    1.2%
5.2:   56.9%
5.3:   39.0%
5.4: <  1.0%
Stats for 3.0.8:

Code: Select all

4.3: < 1.0%
4.4:   4.2%
5.0: < 1.0%
5.1:   2.2%
5.2:  67.6%
5.3:  25.5%
Based on this, I think it's fair to assume that by the time 3.1 is released, 5.3 and 5.4 will make up a large majority of our users' platforms. Certainly enough to simply force the rest to upgrade their PHP to 5.3 if they want to update to phpBB 3.1. Do keep in mind that we will continue to support 3.0.x for a while after the release 3.1 as well. So I really do not see a problem with requiring PHP 5.3 at all.

Post Reply