igorw wrote:On topic: I don't think we need 2.0 => 3.1 conversion.
I completely agree. If there are users still on 2.0 then they can upgrade to 3.0 first and then to 3.1. Let's cut out some of the excess fat.
igorw wrote:On topic: I don't think we need 2.0 => 3.1 conversion.

DavidIQ wrote:igorw wrote:On topic: I don't think we need 2.0 => 3.1 conversion.
I completely agree. If there are users still on 2.0 then they can upgrade to 3.0 first and then to 3.1. Let's cut out some of the excess fat.
Noxwizard wrote:We still see support topics every week about converting from phpBB2. If it works, I would suggest leaving it. If it is sufficiently broken, then I wouldn't put much effort into fixing it.


Oleg wrote:If there is no one who cares enough to test the converter, we should probably remove it.
phpbb_search_. The file name differs from the class name, so instantiating the class fails on line 755. This could be remedied by pre-pending $search_type with the prefix. (Edit, this has been fixed by PHPBB3-10637) Other than that, it doesn't appear to have any issues converting everything.imkingdavid wrote:IMO, it makes no sense to include a 2.0->3.0 converter in the 3.1 core package. If it were a 2.0->3.1 converter, then sure. If someone wants to convert from 2.0->3.1, they need to download 3.0 anyway to convert to that, and then upgrade to 3.1 from 3.0.

psoTFX wrote:I went with Olympus because as I said to the teams ... "It's been one hell of a hill to climb"

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests