I haven't really done anything yet, I only spent an hour or so on it xDnextgen wrote:Not bad at your job, I like what I saw.callumacrae wrote:I started writing https://github.com/callumacrae/phpbb-ideas and then went on holiday
RFC Process Change Suggestion
- callumacrae
- Former Team Member
- Posts: 1046
- Joined: Tue Apr 27, 2010 9:37 am
- Location: England
- Contact:
Re: RFC Process Change Suggestion
Re: RFC Process Change Suggestion
But I like the idea.callumacrae wrote:I haven't really done anything yet, I only spent an hour or so on it xDnextgen wrote:Not bad at your job, I like what I saw.callumacrae wrote:I started writing https://github.com/callumacrae/phpbb-ideas and then went on holiday
The voting system of ideas and we could use.
A good option is ideatorrent...
*Imagine a signature super spectacular.*
Re: RFC Process Change Suggestion
And anyone can submit a solution anyway? For e.g. https://sourceforge.net/apps/ideatorren ... nt/idea/1/DavidIQ wrote:We could hack it up so there is the possibility to provide other solutions by other people.
Its just that the idea suggester must submit a solution.
Formerly known as Unknown Bliss
No unsolicited PMs please except for quotes.psoTFX wrote: I went with Olympus because as I said to the teams ... "It's been one hell of a hill to climb"
- callumacrae
- Former Team Member
- Posts: 1046
- Joined: Tue Apr 27, 2010 9:37 am
- Location: England
- Contact:
Re: RFC Process Change Suggestion
Can IdeaTorrent be integrated with phpBB? As in, do users have to register again?
Is there any point in me continuing my WP Ideas Centre clone?
Is there any point in me continuing my WP Ideas Centre clone?
- DavidIQ
- Customisations Team Leader
- Posts: 1904
- Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 4:29 pm
- Location: Earth
- Contact:
Re: RFC Process Change Suggestion
An auth plugin can be cooked up. That's not a problem if we're planning on hosting it.callumacrae wrote:Can IdeaTorrent be integrated with phpBB? As in, do users have to register again?
If you think it can turn out better and you have some demo of it then go for it I guess.callumacrae wrote:Is there any point in me continuing my WP Ideas Centre clone?
- callumacrae
- Former Team Member
- Posts: 1046
- Joined: Tue Apr 27, 2010 9:37 am
- Location: England
- Contact:
Re: RFC Process Change Suggestion
Challenge acceptedDavidIQ wrote:If you think it can turn out better and you have some demo of it then go for it I guess.
Re: RFC Process Change Suggestion
After looking at the github blog, there was a post about a website doing 52 projects in 52 weeks.
The aim was to kickstart projects by developing them a lot in a week and to get more people interested in opensource etc.
One of their projects that they are working on this week is called ideastrike (Github Repo here). You can view the planned features and overview of ideastrike here.
It has (very) good integration with github, a wide developer base and all their other projects seem to be getting a lot of interest and it looks like ideastrike is going the same way.
The aim was to kickstart projects by developing them a lot in a week and to get more people interested in opensource etc.
One of their projects that they are working on this week is called ideastrike (Github Repo here). You can view the planned features and overview of ideastrike here.
It has (very) good integration with github, a wide developer base and all their other projects seem to be getting a lot of interest and it looks like ideastrike is going the same way.
Formerly known as Unknown Bliss
No unsolicited PMs please except for quotes.psoTFX wrote: I went with Olympus because as I said to the teams ... "It's been one hell of a hill to climb"
- imkingdavid
- Registered User
- Posts: 1050
- Joined: Thu Jul 30, 2009 12:06 pm
Re: RFC Process Change Suggestion
Wow, based on initial impressions, I like it.Unknown Bliss wrote:After looking at the github blog, there was a post about a website doing 52 projects in 52 weeks.
The aim was to kickstart projects by developing them a lot in a week and to get more people interested in opensource etc.
One of their projects that they are working on this week is called ideastrike (Github Repo here). You can view the planned features and overview of ideastrike here.
It has (very) good integration with github, a wide developer base and all their other projects seem to be getting a lot of interest and it looks like ideastrike is going the same way.
++1
EDIT: Although, it is being build on .NET framework.
Re: RFC Process Change Suggestion
I would like to suggest that you allow people to post RFCs in the 3.1 forum. Then whatever RFC isn't implemented by the time 3.1 is released then it should be moved to the 3.2 forum. Or even have only one RFC forum so that all RFCs are being discussed as if they are going to be implemented in the next major release.
People are posting in 3.2 but their real target is 3.1 which is confusing.
People are posting in 3.2 but their real target is 3.1 which is confusing.
Eric
Re: RFC Process Change Suggestion
I agree, that would be nice.wGEric wrote:I would like to suggest that you allow people to post RFCs in the 3.1 forum. Then whatever RFC isn't implemented by the time 3.1 is released then it should be moved to the 3.2 forum. Or even have only one RFC forum so that all RFCs are being discussed as if they are going to be implemented in the next major release.
People are posting in 3.2 but their real target is 3.1 which is confusing.
Formerly known as CyberAlien.
Free phpBB styles | Premium responsive XenForo styles | Iconify - modern open source replacement for glyph fonts
Free phpBB styles | Premium responsive XenForo styles | Iconify - modern open source replacement for glyph fonts