Like nifty little screenshots on psoTFX's blog. Warped, I might add.the_dan wrote: Actually, there is plenty of evidence for the new style floating around. Just for reference.
But of course PhopBamb's theme will be so much better.
Like nifty little screenshots on psoTFX's blog. Warped, I might add.the_dan wrote: Actually, there is plenty of evidence for the new style floating around. Just for reference.
I retract my previous stament. I have to comment.FronServo wrote: Mine is perfectly stable - why isn't yours?
Your problem is that you've forgotten that the admins never published a "complete" feature list--some are backend features and didn't make it in. Like the module system, which is very nice and new.FronServo wrote: Oh, I see.
Now, question for the devs. If I was able to pull this off in a matter of months - why can't you? Mine is perfectly stable - why isn't yours?
If, devs, you don't believe me, use your imagination, please.
I have the module system, which has been modified to fit my fancy, and to actually work fine. I've been updating code with every CVS update - soon (as in this week) to be frozen for a stable release. Thus, work will begin on version 1.1. Plus, 'till you stop dev on Olympus, if there's any new features, they will be incorporated into new versions of mine.Cap'n Refsmmat wrote:Your problem is that you've forgotten that the admins never published a "complete" feature list--some are backend features and didn't make it in. Like the module system, which is very nice and new.FronServo wrote: Oh, I see.
Now, question for the devs. If I was able to pull this off in a matter of months - why can't you? Mine is perfectly stable - why isn't yours?
If, devs, you don't believe me, use your imagination, please.
Sir, you have just failed your english class.nuckfan15 wrote: Funniest thread evarrrr. In the history of phpBB.
True of course, I can't deny it. There are a few bugs, flaws in the code. This is to be expected. I am finding and destroying said bugs, as is the reason for the late release of mine.the_dan wrote: By bets are on for:
Bug ridden.
Inferiror in terms of features to phpBB, possibly right now (what you see here, isn't what you get), or maybe, at a stretch, with the final release.
Inferior code standard to phpBB.
Anyone want to join?
I have tested it for months, i have had quite a large number (438) testing (some, yes, of which come here to find bugs HERE). Not a valid answer.AdamR wrote: I retract my previous stament. I have to comment.
Define stable, please. Has your product been used by hundreds of thousands to work out bugs? Has it stood the test of time for security issues? I thought not. I predict you'll be up to your head not knowing what to do just from that alone.
- Adam