Good for you. I guess you think I like causing trouble. Yup, I purposly did not read Acyd's post... Are you nuts? Whatever, make your own conclusions. I ask questions to seek knowledge, not for anything else.CLee wrote:If there is, then it only affects dmaj007 as I saw your explanation the first time.Acyd Burn wrote: Sometimes i wonder if there is a bug where all posts from the development group gets hidden to all others[.]
Acyd's Antics, an inconsistency in the code
Forum rules
Discussion of general topics related to the new release and its place in the world. Don't discuss new features, report bugs, ask for support, et cetera. Don't use this to spam for other boards or attack those boards!
Discussion of general topics related to the new release and its place in the world. Don't discuss new features, report bugs, ask for support, et cetera. Don't use this to spam for other boards or attack those boards!
Re: Acyd's Antics, an inconsistency in the code
Re: Acyd's Antics, an inconsistency in the code
Then what part ofdmaj007 wrote: Good for you. I guess you think I like causing trouble. Yup, I purposly did not read Acyd's post... Are you nuts? Whatever, make your own conclusions. I ask questions to seek knowledge, not for anything else.
did you not understand? Regardless, I find it amusing that the developers are entertaining your ramblings. I find it even more amusing that you have such a quibble with the use of sizeof(). Last time I checked, Acyd didn't need your approval for his coding methods. But heck, it's open source. If Acyd's "antics" bother you so much, why not load up your favorite text editor and change all instances of sizeof to count if it makes you feel any better. You could even make your a fork called phpbb3 'The Count' to specifically address this "issue".Acyd Burn wrote: I think this falls under "personal preference"?
phpBB phpBB phpBB phpBB
Re: Acyd's Antics, an inconsistency in the code
First off, "Antics" were chosen out for a playfull tone, I am sorry if you do not have a heart. Second, I miss read something, this is not something I can not do and I really did not badger him on what he should do. I just asked him a question. May I please have evidence of doing more then that? This is getting silly, offtopic, and does not pertain to the purpous of the initial question. If you have an issue with me, start a new thread, don't kill mine.
Re: Acyd's Antics, an inconsistency in the code
Your 'questions' were responded to, there's no need for the pointless dribble to continue.