How would you decide if enough MODs had been ported to extensions? Considering a lot of MODs don't get updated by their authors anymore you can't say something like half the MODs in the DB, or even a quarter probably.Oleg wrote:That was in response to viewtopic.php?p=234789#p234789 and the following post. The issue is not with 3.1's quality, but rather that it may take some time before 3.x + extensions fulfills the needs of 3.0 + modifications boards. There is another post on this somewhere that I cannot find at the moment.ecwpa wrote:As a board admin, this worries me a bit. It makes the impression that 3.1 will be a unfinished beta. Who would recommend installing it if that's the case? without even knowing when is 3.2 going to be released.Oleg wrote:A possible solution to maintaining 3.0, 3.1 and 3.2 concurrently is to declare 3.1 an interim release of sorts, which will not be maintained long after 3.2 is released.
The idea is that boards that do not have many modifications can upgrade to 3.1, and subsequently to the following 3.x releases. Boards that do have modifications will wait for those modifications to be ported to 3.x as extensions. If 3.2 is released before the modifications are so ported we can de-support 3.1 instead of de-supporting 3.0.
Apart from that, 6 months would be plenty long enough for those that are going to port MODs to extensions to do it and have their MODs in the Development Forums, 12 months should be long enough to get them validated.
Can anyone remember how long it took to port most phpBB2 MODs to phpBB 3 that did get ported?