phpBB

Development Discussion Board

phpBB's testing ground of bleeding edge code
Advanced search

RFC Process Change Suggestion

Discuss general development subjects that are not specific to a particular version like the versioning control system we use or other infrastructure.

Re: RFC Process Change Suggestion

Postby callumacrae » Wed Dec 28, 2011 11:49 pm

nextgen wrote:
callumacrae wrote:I started writing https://github.com/callumacrae/phpbb-ideas and then went on holiday

Not bad at your job, I like what I saw. :)

I haven't really done anything yet, I only spent an hour or so on it xD
"In JavaScript, there is a beautiful, elegant, highly expressive language that is buried under a steaming pile of good intentions and blunders"
—Douglas Crockford

View my MOD, phpBB Mobile
User avatar
callumacrae
Website Team
Website Team
 
Posts: 882
Joined: Tue Apr 27, 2010 9:37 am
Location: England

Re: RFC Process Change Suggestion

Postby nextgen » Wed Dec 28, 2011 11:52 pm

callumacrae wrote:
nextgen wrote:
callumacrae wrote:I started writing https://github.com/callumacrae/phpbb-ideas and then went on holiday

Not bad at your job, I like what I saw. :)

I haven't really done anything yet, I only spent an hour or so on it xD

But I like the idea. :P

The voting system of ideas and we could use. :)
A good option is ideatorrent...
phpBB®: Become a Junior Styles Validator
I prefer to ask and not stay with the doubt...
User avatar
nextgen
Registered User
 
Posts: 90
Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2010 4:59 am
Location: Guatemala

Re: RFC Process Change Suggestion

Postby MichaelC » Thu Dec 29, 2011 1:02 am

DavidIQ wrote:We could hack it up so there is the possibility to provide other solutions by other people. :idea:

And anyone can submit a solution anyway? For e.g. https://sourceforge.net/apps/ideatorren ... nt/idea/1/
Its just that the idea suggester must submit a solution.
Unknown Bliss
psoTFX wrote:I went with Olympus because as I said to the teams ... "It's been one hell of a hill to climb"

No unsolicited PMs please except for quotes.
User avatar
MichaelC
Website Team
Website Team
 
Posts: 797
Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2010 6:29 pm

Re: RFC Process Change Suggestion

Postby callumacrae » Fri Dec 30, 2011 4:45 pm

Can IdeaTorrent be integrated with phpBB? As in, do users have to register again?

Is there any point in me continuing my WP Ideas Centre clone? :(
"In JavaScript, there is a beautiful, elegant, highly expressive language that is buried under a steaming pile of good intentions and blunders"
—Douglas Crockford

View my MOD, phpBB Mobile
User avatar
callumacrae
Website Team
Website Team
 
Posts: 882
Joined: Tue Apr 27, 2010 9:37 am
Location: England

Re: RFC Process Change Suggestion

Postby DavidIQ » Fri Dec 30, 2011 4:55 pm

callumacrae wrote:Can IdeaTorrent be integrated with phpBB? As in, do users have to register again?
An auth plugin can be cooked up. That's not a problem if we're planning on hosting it.

callumacrae wrote:Is there any point in me continuing my WP Ideas Centre clone? :(
If you think it can turn out better and you have some demo of it then go for it I guess. ;)
Image
User avatar
DavidIQ
MOD Team Leader
MOD Team Leader
 
Posts: 753
Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 4:29 pm
Location: Earth

Re: RFC Process Change Suggestion

Postby callumacrae » Fri Dec 30, 2011 4:58 pm

DavidIQ wrote:If you think it can turn out better and you have some demo of it then go for it I guess. ;)

Challenge accepted :D
"In JavaScript, there is a beautiful, elegant, highly expressive language that is buried under a steaming pile of good intentions and blunders"
—Douglas Crockford

View my MOD, phpBB Mobile
User avatar
callumacrae
Website Team
Website Team
 
Posts: 882
Joined: Tue Apr 27, 2010 9:37 am
Location: England

Re: RFC Process Change Suggestion

Postby MichaelC » Sat Jan 21, 2012 12:54 pm

After looking at the github blog, there was a post about a website doing 52 projects in 52 weeks.

The aim was to kickstart projects by developing them a lot in a week and to get more people interested in opensource etc.

One of their projects that they are working on this week is called ideastrike (Github Repo here). You can view the planned features and overview of ideastrike here.

It has (very) good integration with github, a wide developer base and all their other projects seem to be getting a lot of interest and it looks like ideastrike is going the same way.
Unknown Bliss
psoTFX wrote:I went with Olympus because as I said to the teams ... "It's been one hell of a hill to climb"

No unsolicited PMs please except for quotes.
User avatar
MichaelC
Website Team
Website Team
 
Posts: 797
Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2010 6:29 pm

Re: RFC Process Change Suggestion

Postby imkingdavid » Sat Jan 21, 2012 2:17 pm

Unknown Bliss wrote:After looking at the github blog, there was a post about a website doing 52 projects in 52 weeks.

The aim was to kickstart projects by developing them a lot in a week and to get more people interested in opensource etc.

One of their projects that they are working on this week is called ideastrike (Github Repo here). You can view the planned features and overview of ideastrike here.

It has (very) good integration with github, a wide developer base and all their other projects seem to be getting a lot of interest and it looks like ideastrike is going the same way.

Wow, based on initial impressions, I like it.

++1

EDIT: Although, it is being build on .NET framework.
I do custom MODs. PM for a quote!
View My: MODs | Portfolio
Please do NOT contact for support via PM or email.
Remember, the enemy's gate is down.
User avatar
imkingdavid
Development Team
Development Team
 
Posts: 900
Joined: Thu Jul 30, 2009 12:06 pm

Re: RFC Process Change Suggestion

Postby wGEric » Sat Jan 21, 2012 8:44 pm

I would like to suggest that you allow people to post RFCs in the 3.1 forum. Then whatever RFC isn't implemented by the time 3.1 is released then it should be moved to the 3.2 forum. Or even have only one RFC forum so that all RFCs are being discussed as if they are going to be implemented in the next major release.

People are posting in 3.2 but their real target is 3.1 which is confusing.
Eric
wGEric
Registered User
 
Posts: 506
Joined: Wed Jun 11, 2003 2:07 am

Re: RFC Process Change Suggestion

Postby Arty » Sat Jan 21, 2012 8:51 pm

wGEric wrote:I would like to suggest that you allow people to post RFCs in the 3.1 forum. Then whatever RFC isn't implemented by the time 3.1 is released then it should be moved to the 3.2 forum. Or even have only one RFC forum so that all RFCs are being discussed as if they are going to be implemented in the next major release.

People are posting in 3.2 but their real target is 3.1 which is confusing.

I agree, that would be nice.
Formerly known as CyberAlien.
User avatar
Arty
Styles Team
Styles Team
 
Posts: 789
Joined: Wed Mar 06, 2002 2:36 pm
Location: Mars

Previous Next

Return to General Development Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests