BBCodebox Light

General discussion of development ideas and the approaches taken in the 3.x branch of phpBB. The next feature release of phpBB 3 will be 3.3/Proteus.
Forum rules
Please do not post support questions regarding installing, updating, or upgrading phpBB 3.1. If you need support for phpBB 3.1 please visit the 3.1.x Support Forum on phpbb.com.

If you have questions regarding writing extensions please post in Extension Writers Discussion to receive proper guidance from our staff and community.
Danielx64
Registered User
Posts: 304
Joined: Mon Feb 08, 2010 3:42 am

BBCodebox Light

Post by Danielx64 » Sun Jul 08, 2012 4:33 am

Ok, I been looking at this bit of code and I'm not sure if one want to put it into play into the core.

The end result look like this:
27-01-2012 13-38-09.png
27-01-2012 13-38-09.png (7.88 KiB) Viewed 5420 times
What do you think?

User avatar
Meis2M
Registered User
Posts: 427
Joined: Fri Apr 23, 2010 10:18 am
Contact:

Re: BBCodebox Light

Post by Meis2M » Sun Jul 08, 2012 9:17 am

its better use Ckeditor on Tinymce in phpbb core.

User avatar
A_Jelly_Doughnut
Registered User
Posts: 1780
Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2003 4:23 pm

Re: BBCodebox Light

Post by A_Jelly_Doughnut » Sun Jul 08, 2012 9:52 pm

Is this just a propoosal to restyle the BBCode editor or something more involved?
A_Jelly_Doughnut

User avatar
nextgen
Registered User
Posts: 128
Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2010 4:59 am
Location: Guatemala
Contact:

Re: BBCodebox Light

Post by nextgen » Sun Jul 08, 2012 10:06 pm

I guess the restyle wants to the editor.
*Imagine a signature super spectacular.*

Danielx64
Registered User
Posts: 304
Joined: Mon Feb 08, 2010 3:42 am

Re: BBCodebox Light

Post by Danielx64 » Mon Jul 09, 2012 5:15 am

A_Jelly_Doughnut wrote:Is this just a propoosal to restyle the BBCode editor or something more involved?
Restyle the BBCode editor :)

Main code from: http://www.phpbb3bbcodes.com/viewtopic.php?f=45&t=1381

User avatar
psoTFX
Registered User
Posts: 1984
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2001 8:50 pm
Contact:

Re: BBCodebox Light

Post by psoTFX » Mon Jul 09, 2012 5:07 pm

I like it tbh - it's a "small" change but helps "modernise" up the editor without awaiting a wysiwyg solution. And looks, however much we hate it can dictate opinion. Perhaps it could be tied in with a general overhaul of the editor javascript.

User avatar
DavidIQ
Customisations Team Leader
Customisations Team Leader
Posts: 1775
Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 4:29 pm
Location: Earth
Contact:

Re: BBCodebox Light

Post by DavidIQ » Mon Jul 09, 2012 9:34 pm

Is this even valid with the addition of the WYSIWYG editor?
Image

Danielx64
Registered User
Posts: 304
Joined: Mon Feb 08, 2010 3:42 am

Re: BBCodebox Light

Post by Danielx64 » Tue Jul 10, 2012 12:00 am

DavidIQ wrote:Is this even valid with the addition of the WYSIWYG editor?

It not a WYSIWYG editor, all it does just just make the buttons on the posting page look a little better, thats all. Or am I not understanding you correctly?

User avatar
DavidIQ
Customisations Team Leader
Customisations Team Leader
Posts: 1775
Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 4:29 pm
Location: Earth
Contact:

Re: BBCodebox Light

Post by DavidIQ » Tue Jul 10, 2012 12:27 am

The buttons on the posting page would be replaced by those in the WYSIWYG editor is what I mean.
Image

Danielx64
Registered User
Posts: 304
Joined: Mon Feb 08, 2010 3:42 am

Re: BBCodebox Light

Post by Danielx64 » Tue Jul 10, 2012 12:31 am

Oh sorry, also I was under the impression that that RFC was rejected.

Post Reply