Instant Messenger

Discuss features as they are added to the new version. Give us your feedback. Don't post bug reports, feature requests, support questions or suggestions here.
Forum rules
Discuss features as they are added to the new version. Give us your feedback. Don't post bug reports, feature requests, support questions or suggestions here. Feature requests are closed.
Post Reply
ICY
Registered User
Posts: 18
Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2003 7:32 am
Contact:

Instant Messenger

Post by ICY »

Is this built in in the CVS as messenger.php if not i think it would be a good idea to have like a web based instant messenger on the server, just before 2.0 started development i asked about a mod like this and it turned out to be a popup saying "you have a new PM" :s not what i had described but good anyway :P
anyentertainment
Registered User
Posts: 6
Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2003 7:39 pm

Re: Instant Messenger

Post by anyentertainment »

good idea ICY, a php Instant Messenger
User avatar
VxJasonxV
Registered User
Posts: 341
Joined: Sun Mar 02, 2003 2:51 pm
Location: Castle Rock, CO
Contact:

Re: Instant Messenger

Post by VxJasonxV »

As if that'd be much different than a Private Message?
Only slightly.

Instant Message protocal transport was recently introduced (and by recently, I mean sometime in the last month as far as I know ^^;), and they've had the ability to notify users via Jabber for quite some time now.

What would your advantages of the Board Messanger be over the Board PM system?
"If You Support It, They Will Come."
"Construction"
warmweer
Registered User
Posts: 110
Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2003 5:27 pm
Location: Belgium

Re: Instant Messenger

Post by warmweer »

Frankly I think an instant messenger is way beyond the purpose of a php forum. I see no point in an instant messaging system which could be used when a user is not logged in. And when one is logged in the PM system works instantaneously to get one's attention. If further conversation is deemed necessary there are lots of buttons which can be used so that one's favorite instant messaging system is started instead of something new which would have to be analysed, coded, tested, reanalysed, recoded and retested in alpha, beta and gamma stages and may well not be up to the "standards" expected (read: have all the bells IM users are used to).

Mind you, I think it's a good idea for a mod, but not as a standard feature.
Procrastination is my hobby, but I keep on postponing it.
RyanThaDude29
Registered User
Posts: 90
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2003 5:46 am
Location: Northwest Indiana
Contact:

Re: Instant Messenger

Post by RyanThaDude29 »

I agree with warmweer. I really don't think it's necessary. For those who really need it, could use/write a MOD. The current PM system should be enough (when it's done, of course ;))
User avatar
Ptirhiik_
Registered User
Posts: 526
Joined: Tue Nov 18, 2003 8:35 am

Re: Instant Messenger

Post by Ptirhiik_ »

Not mentioning the crap that let those kind of php messanger in your database low level indexes, and the ressources consumption...
User avatar
MarkS
Registered User
Posts: 92
Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2003 10:53 pm
Location: Florida, USA

Re: Instant Messenger

Post by MarkS »

Definately unnecessary. This is exactly why there is a place in your profile to enter your MSN/AIM/ICQ/Yahoo address. 4 types of IMs right there. If people want to talk live, they can install a MOD or exchange IM account names.
Proud supporter of the phpBB Group!
No Support via E-Mail, MSN, or PM
phpBB v2.2
and the future begins now...
Roberdin
Registered User
Posts: 1546
Joined: Wed Apr 09, 2003 8:44 pm
Location: London, United Kingdom

Re: Instant Messenger

Post by Roberdin »

You missed out the best of all - Jabber. :P

phpBB2.2 will/does have the capability to directly commmunicate with Jabber messengers instead of e-mailing the user in question - useful if you're online and want to know that that all important PM has just arrive now, instead of the next time you check your mail/visit the site. I believe that it may also be able to IM other messengers in a similar fashion over a Jabber transport.
Rob
Post Reply