cvs commit log?

Discussion of general topics related to the new version and its place in the world. Don't discuss new features, report bugs, ask for support, et cetera. Don't use this to spam for other boards or attack those boards!
Forum rules
Discussion of general topics related to the new release and its place in the world. Don't discuss new features, report bugs, ask for support, et cetera. Don't use this to spam for other boards or attack those boards!
Nuttyguy
Registered User
Posts: 20
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 7:41 am
Location: Lewiston, ID

cvs commit log?

Post by Nuttyguy »

anybody know where it went or why its not working? I had the opentools commit log bookmarked, but now its no longer working. I come to area51, and click cvs stats, and that link doesnt work either.

Just trying to keep up with progress, is it possible their getting rid of cvs and getting ready for a beta release?

rivaldo
Registered User
Posts: 269
Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2005 1:05 am
Contact:

Re: cvs commit log?

Post by rivaldo »

Nuttyguy wrote: anybody know where it went or why its not working? I had the opentools commit log bookmarked, but now its no longer working. I come to area51, and click cvs stats, and that link doesnt work either.

Just trying to keep up with progress, is it possible their getting rid of cvs and getting ready for a beta release?
Keep dreaming about that last part. Try this URL and bookmark it: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/foru ... um_id=2657" target="_blank

DeadEye686
Registered User
Posts: 448
Joined: Mon Jul 21, 2003 7:18 pm
Contact:

Re: cvs commit log?

Post by DeadEye686 »

SourceForge recently introduced SVN servers, so it's *possible* they're converting their repositories over to SVN. Not at all likely. More likely is that the SF CVS servers are *beep* up, as they are apt to do on a regular basis.

User avatar
A_Jelly_Doughnut
Registered User
Posts: 1780
Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2003 4:23 pm

Re: cvs commit log?

Post by A_Jelly_Doughnut »

subVersion is beta testing at Sourceforge...but CVS will not be going away at all.
A_Jelly_Doughnut

User avatar
NNO-Stephen
Registered User
Posts: 398
Joined: Fri May 23, 2003 12:47 am
Location: Tulsa, Oklahoma
Contact:

Re: cvs commit log?

Post by NNO-Stephen »

rivaldo wrote:
Nuttyguy wrote: anybody know where it went or why its not working? I had the opentools commit log bookmarked, but now its no longer working. I come to area51, and click cvs stats, and that link doesnt work either.

Just trying to keep up with progress, is it possible their getting rid of cvs and getting ready for a beta release?
Keep dreaming about that last part. Try this URL and bookmark it: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/foru ... um_id=2657" target="_blank
yeah, but that's phpBB2....
Image

User avatar
A_Jelly_Doughnut
Registered User
Posts: 1780
Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2003 4:23 pm

Re: cvs commit log?

Post by A_Jelly_Doughnut »

No, it is both phpBB2 and phpBB3. It just happens the most recent commit was for 2.0
A_Jelly_Doughnut

Spectral Dragon
Registered User
Posts: 208
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 1:45 pm
Location: Milan, MI
Contact:

Re: cvs commit log?

Post by Spectral Dragon »

A_Jelly_Doughnut wrote: No, it is both phpBB2 and phpBB3. It just happens the most recent commit was for 2.0
Not seeing 3 anywhere, thinking this isn't the case.

User avatar
Acyd Burn
Posts: 1838
Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2002 5:18 pm
Location: Behind You
Contact:

Re: cvs commit log?

Post by Acyd Burn »

DeadEye686 wrote: More likely is that the SF CVS servers are *beep* up, as they are apt to do on a regular basis.
Indeed.

Image

Graham
Registered User
Posts: 1304
Joined: Tue Mar 19, 2002 7:11 pm
Location: UK

Re: cvs commit log?

Post by Graham »

The mailing list contains commits for all versions:

2.0.x commits are labelled phpBB_2_0_0
2.1/3.0 commits have no label
"So Long, and Thanks for All the Fish"

Graham
Eeek, a blog!

User avatar
NNO-Stephen
Registered User
Posts: 398
Joined: Fri May 23, 2003 12:47 am
Location: Tulsa, Oklahoma
Contact:

Re: cvs commit log?

Post by NNO-Stephen »

Graham wrote: The mailing list contains commits for all versions:

2.0.x commits are labelled phpBB_2_0_0
2.1/3.0 commits have no label
that would explain why i didnt' see any 2.1/3.0 entries :p

thanks for the info.
Image

Post Reply