phpBB 3.0.11 Release Candidate 2 published

[Dragosvr92]

No problem. I re-ran the database update and everything is fine now.

[RMcGirr83]

@Bantu, I am still getting that error previously reported.

The file ./../styles/prosilver_se/template/bbcode.html is missing.

and this time even installing prosilver as a style it still fails with the above

EDIT:

Only way I could do the update was to activate prosilver and make prosilver the default style on the forum.

[naderman]

Can you get us a copy of the board where you are having this problem? We've tried rather hard to reproduce this, but it's just not happening for any of us.

[RMcGirr83]

Can you be more specfic as to what you are wanting from the board? Files and db or.....

[naderman]

Everything Or at least as much as you can give us.

[Ger]

Maybe you can simply make a copy for yourself, deleting all forums (and topics/posts with that) and users, excl. an owners account? That, repacked with all files (excl. avatars and attachements) should suffice I'd say.

[RMcGirr83]

I gave it to him that very day.

[naderman]

Ok finally worked this out (sorry I was gone for vacation for a while).

The problem is caused by the mchat hook that you have running on the install pages as well. However the style setup there isn't the usual (as the special install style is used) and apparently bbcodes don't work correctly there.

So the simple fix would be to change your hook to do the following, to avoid running it on install pages:

Code: Select all


function hook_mchat(&$hook)
{
    if (defined('IN_INSTALL'))
    {
        return;
    } 

I suppose the unavailability of bbcode handling on the installation pages is a bug as well, but I think one that can be looked at for 3.0.12.

The problem is that set_custom_template will remove any information about inheritance, as the custom template (adm/style) does not inherit from anywhere. However the custom adm/style template does not provide any bbcode.html file. This can either be solved by copying the prosilver one there as a default, or by building in some sort of hardcoded bbcode rendering. Neither of these seems ideal to me.

[RMcGirr83]

Thanks for the explanation Nils.

[bantu]

Maybe we should add a "Add this code snippet to your hook, if you do not want it to run in the installer." note to the hooks section in documentation. We could probably even do this for 3.0.11. On the other side, we might just want to fix the underlying bug for 3.0.12.