Search found 335 matches
- Tue Dec 27, 2005 6:22 pm
- Forum: [3.0/Olympus] New features discussion
- Topic: 1000 to 1,000
- Replies: 27
- Views: 28121
Re: 1000 to 1,000
It could probably be defined in the language files, if its country dependency can be assumed from the language, otherwise it could be added to the user profile so they can choose it like they do with date format, time zone, etc.
- Mon Dec 26, 2005 10:15 am
- Forum: SQL Parser
- Topic: AFTER supported y/n?
- Replies: 14
- Views: 29177
Re: AFTER supported y/n?
I'm curious... why would you do it? For SQL engines that do not support this option, the only probably way would look something like: * Extract the table defition and include the new column wherever you wish. * CREATE newtable. * INSERT INTO newtable SELECT colum-list FROM oldtable. * DROP TABLE old...
- Mon Dec 26, 2005 9:56 am
- Forum: SQL Parser
- Topic: AFTER supported y/n?
- Replies: 14
- Views: 29177
Re: AFTER supported y/n?
Hi ...and Merry Christmas!
No, it is not because (even if it is not explicit in the MySQL manual or I do not recall where it is), afaik, it is a MySQL extension to the SQL standard. It is not supported by other SQL engines such as PostgreSQL.
No, it is not because (even if it is not explicit in the MySQL manual or I do not recall where it is), afaik, it is a MySQL extension to the SQL standard. It is not supported by other SQL engines such as PostgreSQL.
- Wed Dec 07, 2005 4:19 pm
- Forum: General EM Discussion
- Topic: EM sql fails when adding column 'after' another column..
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2926
Re: EM sql fails when adding column 'after' another column..
Yes, the AFTER/BEFORE clausules are not supported by all SQL servers.
Please, use the SQL Parser forum for this kind of issues. Thanks
Please, use the SQL Parser forum for this kind of issues. Thanks
- Mon Dec 05, 2005 2:33 pm
- Forum: Chit Chat
- Topic: Mail function
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2708
Re: Mail function
hmm... I believe this is not the best forum to post such questions. You may want to try it here:
http://www.phpbb.com/phpBB/viewforum.php?f=35" target="_blank
http://www.phpbb.com/phpBB/viewforum.php?f=35" target="_blank
- Mon Dec 05, 2005 2:32 pm
- Forum: Chit Chat
- Topic: What I hope is a simple PHP question....
- Replies: 2
- Views: 4203
Re: What I hope is a simple PHP question....
The SET keyword is coded twice, the second one is not needed. I think.
Aside, instead of UNIX_TIMESTAMP() isn't it better to use the same method used by phpBB itself? ie. using the PHP function time()
Aside, instead of UNIX_TIMESTAMP() isn't it better to use the same method used by phpBB itself? ie. using the PHP function time()
- Sun Dec 04, 2005 8:08 pm
- Forum: SQL Parser
- Topic: Wrong querys
- Replies: 2
- Views: 9490
Re: Wrong querys
Oh, it seems the parser gets fooled when using single quotes for the identifiers.
- Sun Dec 04, 2005 8:05 pm
- Forum: Installing MODs with EasyMOD
- Topic: EasyMOD v0.3.0 Valid Actions
- Replies: 9
- Views: 8241
Re: EasyMOD v0.3.0 Valid Actions
Oh, a few days ago the location of this board changed from phpBB22 to phpBB, so the links were broken.
This is now fixed.
This is now fixed.
- Sun Dec 04, 2005 3:29 am
- Forum: Installing MODs with EasyMOD
- Topic: EasyMOD v0.3.0 Valid Actions
- Replies: 9
- Views: 8241
Re: EasyMOD v0.3.0 Valid Actions
1) EM looks for line breaks.
2) Actually, no.
3) the link I posted before contains several links in the topic starter. It is the mother of many, many behind EM.
2) Actually, no.
3) the link I posted before contains several links in the topic starter. It is the mother of many, many behind EM.
- Sat Dec 03, 2005 9:34 pm
- Forum: Installing MODs with EasyMOD
- Topic: EasyMOD v0.3.0 Valid Actions
- Replies: 9
- Views: 8241
Re: EasyMOD v0.3.0 Valid Actions
Aha, you have edited your post while I was writing mine.
You may want to take a look at this:
viewtopic.php?t=12334
You may want to take a look at this:
viewtopic.php?t=12334