Search found 335 matches
- Fri Mar 03, 2006 10:07 pm
- Forum: [3.0/Olympus] New features discussion
- Topic: seo
- Replies: 39
- Views: 42702
Re: seo
Regardless, the sort of URLs Drupal produces are much SE friendlier than the URLs phpBB has... AFAIK, search engines are able to index phpBB very well, so... could you please define "SE friendly" ? ...or do you mean "human friendly" ? ...they're easier to type too. That depends....
- Fri Mar 03, 2006 8:39 pm
- Forum: [3.0/Olympus] New features discussion
- Topic: seo
- Replies: 39
- Views: 42702
Re: seo
However, drupal.org itself still uses links with numbers for most of their nodes, in the form of drupal.org/node/nnnnn. Only when a node is somehow important they create a path alias, but it is not for easy the task of SEs, the purpose is to provide human friendly URLs.
- Sun Jan 15, 2006 1:50 pm
- Forum: General EM Discussion
- Topic: Mods for Easymod?
- Replies: 6
- Views: 9378
Re: Mods for Easymod?
MODs (and phpBB itself) are alive! ...bugs, new features, security fixes, new versions arise, new MODs born that conflict with existing, and on, and on, and on.... No one is able to maintain a compatibility list and keep it up to date... so yes, it is the same old story: trial and error. When instal...
- Sun Jan 15, 2006 1:29 pm
- Forum: Chit Chat
- Topic: would anyone happen to be a WinCVS expert?
- Replies: 3
- Views: 6999
Re: would anyone happen to be a WinCVS expert?
TCL or Python libraries may allow you write/use macros to automate CVS commands, etc. I installed them (available from the WinCVS site) just to avoid the message, but I have never used/needed any macro. It has nothing to do with "Shell functions". To use that, you need a SSH client such as...
- Thu Jan 12, 2006 1:20 pm
- Forum: [3.0/Olympus] New features discussion
- Topic: seo
- Replies: 39
- Views: 42702
Re: seo
But clean URLs are so much easier than content. :( If you copy/paste URLs, it doesn't matter. If you have to type them manually... what's easier to type "viewtopic.php?t=xx" or "insert_title_that_could_even_be_changed_of_topic_here"? Still, it would be good if clean URLs were im...
- Thu Jan 12, 2006 1:11 pm
- Forum: General EM Discussion
- Topic: Using EasyMod with PNphpBB
- Replies: 9
- Views: 9295
Re: Using EasyMod with PNphpBB
You're knocking the wrong door. All these problems are caused by the way phpBB was ported to nuke. There are other solutions out there that do not. The choice is yours.
- Thu Jan 12, 2006 12:59 pm
- Forum: [3.0/Olympus] New features discussion
- Topic: seo
- Replies: 39
- Views: 42702
Re: seo
Search engines offer a free service as a matter to promote non-free services. Otherwise, they won't survive and other companies will born to do it better (whatever it is that allows them to success, survive). So they need to be competitive and attrack as much users as possible to their non-free stuf...
- Wed Jan 11, 2006 10:02 pm
- Forum: [3.0/Olympus] New features discussion
- Topic: 1000 to 1,000
- Replies: 27
- Views: 28121
Re: 1000 to 1,000
Oh, I'm not in the phpBB development team, so I can't really say, if/when/how it will be implemented in Olympus.
OTH, I don't think it may cause any significant performance penalty.
OTH, I don't think it may cause any significant performance penalty.
- Wed Jan 11, 2006 9:52 pm
- Forum: General EM Discussion
- Topic: Using EasyMod with PNphpBB
- Replies: 9
- Views: 9295
Re: Using EasyMod with PNphpBB
There will be no official support for that, I'm afraid.
nukes use a port of phpBB that doesn't use the same directory scheme, which is the problem. I mean, it is their fault if they broke something in the middle... where would we go if we start to fix everyone elses bugs/implementations problems?
nukes use a port of phpBB that doesn't use the same directory scheme, which is the problem. I mean, it is their fault if they broke something in the middle... where would we go if we start to fix everyone elses bugs/implementations problems?
- Wed Jan 11, 2006 9:46 pm
- Forum: [3.0/Olympus] New features discussion
- Topic: 1000 to 1,000
- Replies: 27
- Views: 28121
Re: 1000 to 1,000
Yes, that's what I meant. Thanks