Search found 368 matches
- Sun May 22, 2016 11:51 am
- Forum: [3.x] Discussion
- Topic: Text formatter differences
- Replies: 21
- Views: 42731
Re: Text formatter differences
I'll give that a try. FWIW, I'm not trying to modify the data that's stored in the database. I'm trying to get the data that is stored in the database to parse correctly.
- Sat May 21, 2016 3:56 pm
- Forum: [3.x] Discussion
- Topic: Text formatter differences
- Replies: 21
- Views: 42731
Re: Text formatter differences
Hi Paul, how would you suggest I pass a username link using bbcode?
- Sat May 21, 2016 12:50 pm
- Forum: [3.x] Discussion
- Topic: Text formatter differences
- Replies: 21
- Views: 42731
Re: Text formatter differences
I am actually using the message parser instead of generate text for storage. When I do a var_dump after $message_parser->parse the output looks fine but it somehow gets translated into html characaters when inserted into the database. Using html_entity_decode on $message_parser->message the post is ...
- Sat May 21, 2016 10:36 am
- Forum: [3.x] Discussion
- Topic: Text formatter differences
- Replies: 21
- Views: 42731
Text formatter differences
Morning, I have an extension and when testing it am presented with an issue. In 3.1.x the extension would post into a designated forum and look like this 319.jpg in 3.2 though it looks like this 32.jpg The issue is that the name, while being generated using get_username_string function isn't being p...
- Thu May 12, 2016 9:26 am
- Forum: [3.x] Discussion
- Topic: Here is what I think
- Replies: 10
- Views: 26030
Re: Here is what I think
It is a bit unfair to compare phpBB, a strictly volunteer base of coders, to WP. Wordpress code, while open source, is contributed to by employees of other corporations that sell WordPress related products / services...such as Automattic. WP has thousands of coders participating in the development o...
- Thu May 12, 2016 9:06 am
- Forum: [3.x] Discussion
- Topic: phpBB 3.2.0-b2 released
- Replies: 148
- Views: 356168
Re: phpBB 3.2.0-b2 released
Using either
request_var
or $request->variable
your file works fine in my 3.2.0-b2 install.- Sat May 07, 2016 11:03 am
- Forum: [3.x] Discussion
- Topic: Make use of REQUIRED attribute in forms?
- Replies: 16
- Views: 38640
Re: Make use of REQUIRED attribute in forms?
I am not sure how often, or if, this occurs in phpBB but say for example a field is required when creating a new forum but is not required when amending it I honestly can't think of any scenario where this would occur? If the field is already populated then the required popup thingy doesn't even di...
- Fri May 06, 2016 11:45 pm
- Forum: [3.x] Discussion
- Topic: Make use of REQUIRED attribute in forms?
- Replies: 16
- Views: 38640
Re: Make use of REQUIRED attribute in forms?
It will not invalidate the back end PHP processes. It's simply a tooltip type popup if a user misses an input.Going4Quests wrote: ↑Fri May 06, 2016 8:06 pmI think it would be a great addition to include require, but the back end validation shouldnt be removed.
- Fri May 06, 2016 10:13 am
- Forum: [3.x] Discussion
- Topic: Make use of REQUIRED attribute in forms?
- Replies: 16
- Views: 38640
Re: Make use of REQUIRED attribute in forms?
As far as I can tell the only browser that doesn't support the attribute is safari? How much work are we talking about? When doing a search on both prosilver and adm styles I got 150 hits for the text, email and password types...many of which are, probably, in the same html file.
- Wed May 04, 2016 5:54 pm
- Forum: [3.x] Discussion
- Topic: phpBB 3.2.0-b2 released
- Replies: 148
- Views: 356168
Re: phpBB 3.2.0-b2 released
You've been told more than once why phpBB 3.1.x won't work in PHP 7...get over it all ready.