Development Discussion Board

The ability to ignore people is a useful feature and should not be removed. Renaming foes to something like "Ignore List" would be a good idea since foes isn't very clear on what it does. This sounds like a sensible solution and I agree. The "friends" portion of this doesn't rea...

I don't think so. Mod/Extension would be enough.

Don't like, don't want, don't need the font tag. Please don't.

Reading a topic with 5 differente font types with their different sizes, spacing, etc. is a nightmare.

After a recent website team meeting [whilst discussing this as it's being developed by the website team] it was pointed out that it is better to have a mobile style with JS than no mobile style. If the mobile doesn't have JS then it will automatically revert back to prosilver. The majority of mobil...

It's been downloaded over 17,000 times. I'm not sure what you mean by not worth it, what is the drawback that you're thinking of that makes this not worth it? I was thinking about having yet another option (tab) on the ACP. It's crowed enough right now. It's not a big deal, but, you know, I'd prefe...

I have indeed done so, editing the file and reuploading. Not pretty, but as I've said, not even 1 in a 100 admins would use this easier method.
Maybe it's just a tiny addition to the core, but not worth it in my opinion.

I don't really think that many people would benefit from this. Nobody reads the FAQ, anyway.

Better as an extension, in my opinion.

Well, I don't know if I understand it correctly, but I think that the permission only kicks in if the forum is set to Private Only Read Own Topics Forum (or whatever you want to call it), so the default should be No.

Hi. 1. One role, based on limited. If the permission, as I understand it, allows the people having it to read others' topics, then I'd say: 2. ROLE_DESCRIPTION_FORUM_READ_OTHERS And f_read_others . Edit: I forgot to say that I think this feature should be in the core. If you don't want it just don't...

Really good idea.