Development Discussion Board

phpBB is designed specifically as a forum system. Happy now?

Firefox uses the same method and is accurate to within a few seconds 90% of the time here.

Then why did you mention <p> and <br> ?

birdfoot wrote: Lastly, as for unchecked HTML; if users can't edit via HTML source view, they wouldn't be able to type in HTML would they?

What I mean to say is HTML should never be accepted from a user to be displayed. Only plain text and BBCode.

User agents are inherently unreliable, especially if you only test only occasionally - what if the user logs on elsewhere? What if the user's browser is lying? And by your method, guests would be forced to use the WYSIWYG method, as they would have no way of disabling it. Your last point is immateri...

The style has not been finalised. A new one will be released when phpBB 3 is complete.

Not to mention miles of overclock-ability.

Eh? Where are you buying, your local Dell outlet?

As I understand this vulnerability (where one process can steal data from another being executed simultaneously even if it is 'protected' by the operating system), a user already needs permission to execute arbitary code on the processor to steal information from the other running process. Timing is...

Well it, quite obviously, depends on what you're doing, and which models of Pentium processor you're comparing with which models of which processor types from AMD. Obviously, if the choice is between an Intel Penitum 166Mhz MMX and an AMD Athlon 64 4000+ for a gaming rig, then you're going with the ...