Search found 156 matches
- Tue Jan 18, 2011 1:35 pm
- Forum: [3.x] Discussion
- Topic: 3.1 Status
- Replies: 26
- Views: 63026
Re: 3.1 Status
Hmm. IIRC we've decided to remove it from the 3.1 package but still provide update and support (as a separate package).
- Sat Jan 08, 2011 3:10 pm
- Forum: [3.x] Discussion
- Topic: Defaults for session time to live and profile accessibility
- Replies: 19
- Views: 21475
Re: Defaults for session time to live and profile accessibil
Hmm. IIRC default value is 3600 seconds (=1 hour).nn- wrote:Bump default session ttl to 45 minutes
Code: Select all
INSERT INTO phpbb_config (config_name, config_value) VALUES ('session_gc', '3600');
INSERT INTO phpbb_config (config_name, config_value) VALUES ('session_length', '3600');
- Sat Jan 08, 2011 2:39 pm
- Forum: [3.x] Discussion
- Topic: Defaults for session time to live and profile accessibility
- Replies: 19
- Views: 21475
Re: Defaults for session time to live and profile accessibil
nn-, so, your suggestions are..?
To apply (15|45) minutes for sessions TTL and granting guests permission to view members' profiles as default options?
To apply (15|45) minutes for sessions TTL and granting guests permission to view members' profiles as default options?
- Sat Jan 08, 2011 2:33 pm
- Forum: General Development Discussion
- Topic: Does refactoring count as a feature?
- Replies: 2
- Views: 6779
Re: Does refactoring count as a feature?
In my personal opinion code reorganization has nothing to do with features, and thus it shouldn't require RFC.
- Sat Dec 25, 2010 5:30 pm
- Forum: General Development Discussion
- Topic: php 5.2 eol
- Replies: 1
- Views: 5660
Re: php 5.2 eol
I'd say it does make sense at least for 3.1 because HSP's migration to 5.3 will definitely take some time, so we shouldn't leave a big part of users being unable to use 3.1.
- Sun Oct 17, 2010 2:48 am
- Forum: General Development Discussion
- Topic: what about themes recoloring?
- Replies: 4
- Views: 10310
Re: what about themes recoloring?
Have you ever seen this one?
- Wed Sep 15, 2010 5:49 pm
- Forum: General Development Discussion
- Topic: Removing config.php from git repository
- Replies: 17
- Views: 26667
Re: Removing config.php from git repository
Makes sense, agreed.
- Wed Sep 15, 2010 1:57 pm
- Forum: General Development Discussion
- Topic: Removing config.php from git repository
- Replies: 17
- Views: 26667
Re: Removing config.php from git repository
The installation actually still works without config.php, it will just prompt you to download the file and put it in place manually. Well, actually there should be very few reasons to download empty file. It's much easier just to create one. I think if we'd implement it on installation level we cou...
- Wed Sep 15, 2010 7:31 am
- Forum: General Development Discussion
- Topic: Removing config.php from git repository
- Replies: 17
- Views: 26667
Re: Removing config.php from git repository
The problem is if somebody will try to download the latest source from github to install, it will give the package without config.php.
So we either shall have to put some announce about it on github repo, or make install to create config.php for the case it doesn't exist, or something to do with it.
So we either shall have to put some announce about it on github repo, or make install to create config.php for the case it doesn't exist, or something to do with it.
- Mon Sep 06, 2010 8:49 am
- Forum: [3.1/Ascraeus] Merged RFCs
- Topic: [RFC|Accepted] Coding Guideline Modifications
- Replies: 79
- Views: 153638
Re: [RFC|Accepted] Coding Guideline Modifications
Under the Don't use uninitialized variables part of CG we instruct users about how to avoid warnings caused by uninitialized variables, but we don't really say how we intend to initialize them. I'd suggest to adjust this part in the way like this: <h4>Don't use uninitialized variables.</h4> For phpB...