Search found 1177 matches
- Thu May 28, 2015 11:58 am
- Forum: [3.1/Ascraeus] Merged RFCs
- Topic: [RFC] Documentation System and Requirements
- Replies: 13
- Views: 49022
Re: [RFC] Documentation System and Requirements
Based on this discussion we are in the process of setting up sphinx documentation. It is being created in the 3.1.x and master branches of the existing documentation repository at https://github.com/phpbb/documentation/tree/3.1.x/development . The development directory contains the new developer doc...
- Sun Feb 15, 2015 12:58 am
- Forum: [3.2/Rhea] Merged RFCs
- Topic: [RFC] Integrate s9e\TextFormatter
- Replies: 168
- Views: 434472
Re: [RFC] Integrate s9e\TextFormatter
Please note I did not read or remember the entirety of all previous posts, but went off of your current summary, so if there's already explanations I apologize and the post should be updated to include the reasoning or a link to it. I think this is looking pretty good overall now and I would like to...
- Sun Feb 15, 2015 12:50 am
- Forum: [3.2/Rhea] Merged RFCs
- Topic: [RFC] Integrate s9e\TextFormatter
- Replies: 168
- Views: 434472
Re: [RFC] Integrate s9e\TextFormatter
Such an extensive change would need to take place in a separate PR. I absolutely see the value of storing a copy of the original text, but the development cost is big enough to outweigh it. I think you have a point here. This doesn't make it worse than the situation we already have, so we can simpl...
- Sun Feb 15, 2015 12:46 am
- Forum: [3.x] Rejected Event Requests
- Topic: [PHP] UCP PM submission hook
- Replies: 1
- Views: 23267
Re: [PHP] UCP PM submission hook
Already covered by core.submit_pm_before
- Sat Feb 14, 2015 11:30 pm
- Forum: General Development Discussion
- Topic: Git development branches
- Replies: 23
- Views: 70877
Re: Git development branches
Yeah I think tests are something we can live with breaking though and it's not like that'll be particularly difficult to fix.
As per IRC I would keep the .x suffixes on the branches to make it clear they refer to the branch and not a particular release.
As per IRC I would keep the .x suffixes on the branches to make it clear they refer to the branch and not a particular release.
- Sat Feb 14, 2015 11:01 pm
- Forum: General Development Discussion
- Topic: Git development branches
- Replies: 23
- Views: 70877
Git development branches
Hey all, I think our current branch names are not very clear and meaningful to new or short term contributors and make it more difficult for them to address pull requests correctly. I just changed our default branch back to develop-ascraeus as a lot of bugfix PRs were accidentally made against devel...
- Wed Jan 21, 2015 4:40 pm
- Forum: [3.0/Olympus] Discussion
- Topic: phpBB 3.0.13 Release Candidate 1 published
- Replies: 8
- Views: 55548
phpBB 3.0.13 Release Candidate 1 published
Greetings community! We are happy to announce the availability of the first release candidate of phpBB 3.0.13 aimed at experienced users in an effort to increase the quality of final releases. Please scrutinise this release in-depth and report issues to the bug tracker. Critical bugs halting the boa...
- Fri Nov 21, 2014 5:57 pm
- Forum: [3.2/Rhea] Merged RFCs
- Topic: Moving FAQ to controllers
- Replies: 4
- Views: 25092
Re: Moving FAQ to controllers
Let's keep the FAQ in core rather than an extension. I also agree that it should be phpbb/help/controller/faq.php, so we keep it somewhat a separate subsystem. The URLs you suggested sound good.
- Wed Nov 19, 2014 3:32 pm
- Forum: [3.x][Archive] RFCs
- Topic: Template engine changes to allow for structure flexibility
- Replies: 40
- Views: 150739
Re: Template engine changes to allow for structure flexibility
I think you have to realize there are two distinct issues being discussed here. (1) The current organization and naming of files in prosilver (2) Adding a layer to allow any style to use arbitrary structure and file names We all agree that (1) needs to be changed. So let's just reorganize and rename...
- Sat Nov 01, 2014 10:12 pm
- Forum: [3.x] Discussion
- Topic: Releasing 3.1.1
- Replies: 0
- Views: 14716
Releasing 3.1.1
Todo List for 3.1.1 Make sure phpBB/docs/AUTHORS is up to date ✔ Make sure Contributors have their ranks ✔ Make sure all reports in the security tracker are closed or invalid ✔ Go through Issues fixed in 3.1.1 and correct any unreadable descriptions ✔ Check the feature hightlights wiki page for com...