Search found 342 matches

by Yawnster
Tue Sep 05, 2006 7:20 pm
Forum: [3.0/Olympus] Discussion
Topic: Consensus on Attachment Extensions..
Replies: 71
Views: 74932

Re: Consensus on Attachment Extensions..

From a security standpoint, no for PHP, pl, HTML and XML. From a logical standpoint, no for bmp. It is not an internet-ready image format, and should not be allowed to attach. NeoThermic Aha ok, well ill update the list to include this advice.. I was just wondering why cant XML and HTML be used, is...
by Yawnster
Tue Sep 05, 2006 11:17 am
Forum: [3.0/Olympus] Discussion
Topic: Consensus on Attachment Extensions..
Replies: 71
Views: 74932

Re: Consensus on Attachment Extensions..

Well yes, but why not produce a list of common extensions that could be used.. One that is a little bit more comprehensive than the current one is what I am suggesting.. I know allowing C#, PHP and Perl or anyother kind of webscripting technology would be not be the best, but I see no reason why we ...
by Yawnster
Tue Sep 05, 2006 11:01 am
Forum: [3.0/Olympus] Discussion
Topic: Consensus on Attachment Extensions..
Replies: 71
Views: 74932

Consensus on Attachment Extensions..

Howdy guys, I noticed that the attachment extension list is a little bare to say the least, as when phpBB3.x goes final adding in things like extra file formats to this list wont really be possible.. I was wondering if people could make a list of Attachment Groups and Extensions in each group so we ...
by Yawnster
Tue Sep 05, 2006 10:43 am
Forum: [3.0/Olympus] Discussion
Topic: Attachment Extensions permitted by default..
Replies: 3
Views: 5342

Re: Attachment Extensions permitted by default..

right ok.. well i will create a topic here and try to get some opinions on file formats that could be enabled by default..

Thanks for the answer Dominik.. Yawnster
by Yawnster
Mon Sep 04, 2006 9:36 pm
Forum: [3.0/Olympus] Discussion
Topic: My theory on Olympus...
Replies: 11
Views: 16478

Re: My theory on Olympus...

I think someone has a little bit too much time on their hands..
by Yawnster
Sun Sep 03, 2006 9:27 pm
Forum: [3.0/Olympus] Discussion
Topic: This Forum - Will it be deleted?
Replies: 5
Views: 7760

Re: This Forum - Will it be deleted?

wait.... that means that it would just run on phpBB3 with just a bit of modifications until it started becoming phpBB4, right? Or is there a real real real early CVS of phpBB4 already? No there isnt, and its more likely to be 3.2 I believe, as the Community coding projects are expected to be comple...
by Yawnster
Sun Sep 03, 2006 4:45 pm
Forum: [3.0/Olympus] Styling
Topic: RC1 Including New Stuff?
Replies: 10
Views: 17451

Re: RC1 Including New Stuff?

Yes and no :P The ACP and installation are deliberately templated that way so that they are not dependent on any particular style. Thus it is highly unlikely that we will change the templates in any way. We might alter the CSS to some extent to synchronise colours/fonts a bit more but that would be...
by Yawnster
Sun Sep 03, 2006 9:28 am
Forum: [3.0/Olympus] Discussion
Topic: Attachment Extensions permitted by default..
Replies: 3
Views: 5342

Attachment Extensions permitted by default..

I was wondering if you guys had any plans to change the current list of allowed attachment extensions.. I personally use the OpenDocument Format as my main document format, I was just wondering if you were going to expand the list to include formats like this, also non-windows/real-media media forma...
by Yawnster
Sun Sep 03, 2006 9:08 am
Forum: [3.0/Olympus] Styling
Topic: RC1 Including New Stuff?
Replies: 10
Views: 17451

Re: RC1 Including New Stuff?

I dont think ive ever seen the answer to this question so ill go ahead and ask..

Will the ACP Style change with the new template? (I know the ACP has 1 style hardcoded into it).. But will it change to look like the new style?

Yawnster