Search found 224 matches
- Mon Aug 22, 2016 12:07 pm
- Forum: [3.x] Discussion
- Topic: Style changes for 3.2 ProSilver
- Replies: 14
- Views: 36273
Re: Style changes for 3.2 ProSilver
- Wed Aug 17, 2016 1:49 pm
- Forum: [3.x] Discussion
- Topic: Style changes for 3.2 ProSilver
- Replies: 14
- Views: 36273
Re: Style changes for 3.2 ProSilver
Updated download in first post after making a small change to make sub-hover for quick jump menu white in colour, as 3.1 doesn't use hover colour for quick jump menu and only link styling. Missed that before with 3.2
- Wed Aug 17, 2016 1:16 pm
- Forum: [3.x] Discussion
- Topic: Style changes for 3.2 ProSilver
- Replies: 14
- Views: 36273
Re: Style changes for 3.2 ProSilver
Added a demo board, check link added in first post
No email activation is required if you want to join it and test things out playing around
No email activation is required if you want to join it and test things out playing around
- Wed Aug 17, 2016 11:36 am
- Forum: [3.x] Discussion
- Topic: Style changes for 3.2 ProSilver
- Replies: 14
- Views: 36273
Re: Style changes for 3.2 ProSilver
Glad you like it, and I use the style with my phpBB 3.1 forum and it's not a style I only just created. It was created 12 months ago for 3.1 for my site only and decided to convert it over to 3.2. I have posted a screen-shot now of what it looks like used on my 3.1 forum with "a different logo&...
- Tue Aug 16, 2016 11:47 pm
- Forum: [3.x] Discussion
- Topic: Style changes for 3.2 ProSilver
- Replies: 14
- Views: 36273
Re: Style changes for 3.2 ProSilver
No, I took the forum down after testing the style. As I run a live private phpBB 3.1.x forum as my main forum
You can always install phpBB 3.2 RC1 and then install the theme to see it.
You can always install phpBB 3.2 RC1 and then install the theme to see it.
- Tue Aug 16, 2016 6:35 pm
- Forum: [3.x] Discussion
- Topic: Style changes for 3.2 ProSilver
- Replies: 14
- Views: 36273
Style changes for 3.2 ProSilver
Link removed
- Mon Mar 16, 2015 9:25 am
- Forum: [3.x] Discussion
- Topic: phpBB 3.1 load
- Replies: 34
- Views: 78617
Re: phpBB 3.1 load
I've run 3.0 and 3.1 now. Without a doubt 3.1 is slower than 3.0. Also, if you run a 3.1 forum through Google Speed test site as a benchmark, it'll usually come back with pretty bad results for speed, and no matter which 3.1 forum you run through it. They all tend to get poor results on speed. https...
- Sun Mar 01, 2015 9:58 am
- Forum: [3.x][Archive] RFCs
- Topic: Change "can email user" to No after registration
- Replies: 1
- Views: 10202
Change "can email user" to No after registration
When a person joins the forum for first time. The default setting for emailing user is set to Yes. I want to request that it be changed to No by default on new registrations. The user changes it to Yes themselves later on if wanting to receive emails. Snap1.png A few reason why it would be best set ...
- Sun Feb 22, 2015 10:04 am
- Forum: [3.x] Tickets Discussion
- Topic: PHPBB3-10418 - WYSIWYG Editor/Rich Text Editor
- Replies: 461
- Views: 1059319
Re: WYSIWYG Editor/Rich Text Editor
I don't know why you just don't keep the same plain text editor and simply make things like the IMG and URL BBCode links use popup input boxes instead. I've yet to see any WYSIWYG Editor that isn't buggy and suffers from issues with things across different browsers. There is also the problem with WY...
- Sat Feb 21, 2015 8:42 pm
- Forum: [3.x] Tickets Discussion
- Topic: PHPBB3-10418 - WYSIWYG Editor/Rich Text Editor
- Replies: 461
- Views: 1059319
Re: WYSIWYG Editor/Rich Text Editor
Which editor are you now talking about using SCEditor or CKEditor with 3.2?
I thought you scrapped the idea of using CKEditor in favour of using SCEditor
I thought you scrapped the idea of using CKEditor in favour of using SCEditor