Development Discussion Board

I'm the one that gave most implementation code to phpBB's WYSIWYG editor project. @DavidIQ . I can tell you. My implementation works with all BBCode I was able to put my hands on, both custom and included. The only BBCode I'm completely unable to cope with, which is also what lead me to enter in thi...

There's an extension, ATM.
Let's see how popular it is first.

What MIGHT be useful is to "float" the posting area so that if there is a long list of smileys, a problem caused by the administrator themselves, the posting box along with the buttons moves down when the user scrolls down, docking that section to the top of the screen. I disagree. In my ...

Even when scrolling I don't get what the image is supposed to represent...

My suggestion for a trade off would probably be something like this: Support the PHP version not EOL on release of final, unless a dependency requires a larger version. Seems good enough for me. @Nicofuma, what do you think? That would be 5.5 for phpBB 3.2. I thought it was 5.4 O_O. Did I misread? ...

bantu wrote: ↑Mon Aug 24, 2015 12:59 pm My suggestion for a trade off would probably be something like this: Support the PHP version not EOL on release of final, unless a dependency requires a larger version.

Seems good enough for me.
@Nicofuma, what do you think?

I think that announcing phpBB 5.2 requiring php 5.5 now is too late. I believe you should warn with much more time in advance.
However, announcing phpBB 5.3 requiring php 5.5 seems fine to me. We might even require php 7 if it comes out this year...

Personally, I don't mind as long as it shouldn't be something to forcefully being relied on when it could have been done differently.

Yep you are right. The fact that the unit is the file doesn't help at all. It an easily cause extensions to start fighting eachother... Way more than if just using the events. My main point is that extensions can also remove complete stuff altogether, not just add. Other than that... yeah. It still ...

I think you got a wrong idea.
At the extension points, it's true, you may only add HTML, js, etc...
BUT!
You may also replace the HTML files completely in your extension. The problem there, though... The unit is the file...