Development Discussion Board

Meis2M wrote:it is better phpbb 3.0.8 dont come.
Suddenly phpBB 3.1 come and It is Christmas gifts from Santa Claus

Why does 3.0.8 have any bearing on 3.1?

As a stop gap: http://www.pagebakers.nl/2009/01/29/git ... ked-files/

It should have been removed a long time ago imo. Perhaps we can use .gitignore as a stop gap.

nn- wrote:if test $(cat $file |cut -c 80- |wc -w) -ne 0; then
echo $file has lines exceeding 79 chars
fi

That's a nice solution, but yes I've already fixed it unless there is further issues.

I might be mistaken but aren't the data attributes introduced in the HTML 5 spec? Yes, that is correct. But this is phpBB 3.2 so it might be feasible, plus it's already supported by all browsers (afaik). I guess we'll have to see if we want to go down that route. http://dev.w3.org/html5/html-author...

eviL3 wrote:Can we have that section commented out until a cross-platform solution is found? I'd really like to re-enable my git plugins.

http://tracker.phpbb.com/browse/PHPBB3-9808

Yes to including jQuery :-) No to loading from Google (or another CDN). While google's servers may be reliable, my connection to them is not. Particularly here in China, various Google services are often arbitrarily blocked. All JS should be served from the phpBB instance itself. The loading needs ...

Hi there, i [dev] now over 1 year a kind of private phpbb-wysiwyg and i think, i'am a genius in some things. But, nevermind/anyway: Here are the main points , and here* i stucked over, but it's not impossible: i know that 4 shure. Minimum: Support of Main BBCodes *Auto-Integration of any Custom BBC...

Could we use the build script to set the @version information to the release version, it's always been kind of handy as a quick check.

keith10456 wrote:I'm curious as to why this was bumped to 4.0 instead of 3.2 (or 3.1). Just wondering...

Because it was posted here.