Search found 143 matches
- Mon Nov 18, 2013 6:15 am
- Forum: General Development Discussion
- Topic: Emacs or Vim phpBB mode?
- Replies: 1
- Views: 4844
Re: Emacs or Vim phpBB mode?
Let me start by making a couple of questions. a) Is the 80 column rule acceptable? b) I am reading the coding guidelines for editor settings which has the following example. {TAB}$mode{TAB}{TAB}= request_var('mode', ''); {TAB}$search_id{TAB}= request_var('search_id', ''); Just to be sure with that y...
- Sun Nov 17, 2013 4:09 am
- Forum: General Development Discussion
- Topic: Emacs or Vim phpBB mode?
- Replies: 1
- Views: 4844
Emacs or Vim phpBB mode?
If you have one that follows coding rules or has any other neat trick for phpBB development, feel free to share it
- Thu Nov 14, 2013 3:53 am
- Forum: [3.x] Discussion
- Topic: Support for tags in posts
- Replies: 4
- Views: 6798
Support for tags in posts
I am surprised no one has mentioned this. Extensions could make good usage of them.
I know we are on feature freeze but if this should be an extension then it must be just one (to rule them all ) and maybe later integrate it in the core.
I know we are on feature freeze but if this should be an extension then it must be just one (to rule them all ) and maybe later integrate it in the core.
- Wed Nov 13, 2013 8:14 pm
- Forum: [3.1/Ascraeus] Merged RFCs
- Topic: [RFC|Merged] Extensions
- Replies: 113
- Views: 274034
Re: [RFC|Merged] Extensions
Ι read your proposal in the link you give and I fully agree with it.
- Wed Nov 13, 2013 3:23 pm
- Forum: [3.1/Ascraeus] Merged RFCs
- Topic: [RFC|Merged] Extensions
- Replies: 113
- Views: 274034
Re: [RFC|Merged] Extensions
In ACP, will the name of the tab for extension settings remain as .MODS?
- Tue Nov 12, 2013 3:09 pm
- Forum: [3.x][Archive] RFCs
- Topic: [RFC] Post Revisions
- Replies: 90
- Views: 128557
Re: [RFC] Post Revisions
What's the status of this RFC? Are we gonna see it in 3.1?
I can see that there is activity in github.
Btw this is a very good addition!
I can see that there is activity in github.
Btw this is a very good addition!
- Fri Nov 08, 2013 11:44 pm
- Forum: [3.x] Discussion
- Topic: phpBB 3.1 Information and Status
- Replies: 187
- Views: 380358
Re: phpBB 3.1 Information and Status
Thanks for the quick reply.
Today I was actually looking at your prefixed extension where you define a custom event. Learning through examples is always fun in its own way.
Today I was actually looking at your prefixed extension where you define a custom event. Learning through examples is always fun in its own way.
- Fri Nov 08, 2013 11:27 pm
- Forum: [3.x] Discussion
- Topic: phpBB 3.1 Information and Status
- Replies: 187
- Views: 380358
Re: phpBB 3.1 Information and Status
My bad because I wasn't specific in my first question so I'll use an example. Let's assume that the event overall_footer_after wasn't in the core and I wanted exactly that event in my extension. Could I create such an event in my extension without editing the core files? It's like asking if events t...
- Thu Nov 07, 2013 11:23 am
- Forum: General Development Discussion
- Topic: Area51 navbar source code
- Replies: 4
- Views: 10955
- Thu Nov 07, 2013 11:21 am
- Forum: [3.x] Discussion
- Topic: phpBB 3.1 Information and Status
- Replies: 187
- Views: 380358
Re: phpBB 3.1 Information and Status
I have a question regarding extensions.
For core events there are the appropriate marks in the core code. But then, the addition of non-core events from extensions how is it handled?
For core events there are the appropriate marks in the core code. But then, the addition of non-core events from extensions how is it handled?