How about including the encoding @charset "utf-8"; at the top of every stylesheet?
I know it's not really needed, but it feels more complete that way
Search found 391 matches
- Sat Apr 12, 2014 1:24 am
- Forum: [3.x] Rejected RFCs
- Topic: @charset "utf-8"; in every stylesheet
- Replies: 3
- Views: 20733
- Wed Apr 09, 2014 11:45 pm
- Forum: [3.1/Ascraeus] Merged RFCs
- Topic: [RFC] Move "print view" and "email friend" into the topic tools
- Replies: 17
- Views: 30952
[RFC] Move "print view" and "email friend" into the topic tools
Printing and emailing a friend about a topic are actions associated with a specific topic so how about moving those icons inside the topic tools dropdown list?
- Wed Apr 09, 2014 11:21 pm
- Forum: [3.x][Archive] RFCs
- Topic: [RFC] HTML5 Semantic Elements
- Replies: 20
- Views: 30931
Re: [RFC] HTML5 Semantic Elements
Ok someone please tell me - why is the "shiv" needed? And why a simplebrunoais wrote: The shiv's will take care of years old outdated browsers.
document.createElement("nameOfElementHere");
won't do the job?- Tue Apr 08, 2014 7:53 am
- Forum: [3.x] Rejected RFCs
- Topic: disable directory indexes with .htaccess
- Replies: 7
- Views: 29257
disable directory indexes with .htaccess
Add
It may be of help if you or the user forgets to put in place a blank index file.
Options -Indexes
(in a commented line?) to the .htaccess at the root?It may be of help if you or the user forgets to put in place a blank index file.
- Sat Apr 05, 2014 3:34 am
- Forum: [3.x][Archive] RFCs
- Topic: [RFC] HTML5 Semantic Elements
- Replies: 20
- Views: 30931
Re: [RFC] HTML5 Semantic Elements
Again, why use html5shiv?
document.createElement("nameOfElementHere");
creates a block element that will work like a <div>.- Fri Apr 04, 2014 4:38 pm
- Forum: [3.x][Archive] RFCs
- Topic: [RFC] HTML5 Semantic Elements
- Replies: 20
- Views: 30931
Re: [RFC] HTML5 Semantic Elements
Yeah, I saw that at the w3schools site, but is it necessary? I mean what more do we need other than a simple "createElement"?
- Fri Apr 04, 2014 4:27 pm
- Forum: [3.x][Archive] RFCs
- Topic: [RFC] HTML5 Semantic Elements
- Replies: 20
- Views: 30931
[RFC] HTML5 Semantic Elements
I searched for other RFCs before posting this, using the keywords "html5" and "semantic", but I could only find this relevant topic: Prosilver Overhaul/Modernization Most of the discussion there is from 2011 and it was even debated whether HTML5 should be used in 3.1. Someone mad...
- Fri Apr 04, 2014 3:37 am
- Forum: [3.1/Ascraeus] Merged RFCs
- Topic: [RFC] Search engine optimization: canonical link elements
- Replies: 16
- Views: 66887
Re: [RFC] Search engine optimization: canonical link elements
Was this developed at any point or has it been forgotten?
- Fri Apr 04, 2014 2:57 am
- Forum: [3.x][Archive] RFCs
- Topic: FAQ Manager
- Replies: 45
- Views: 90234
Re: [RFC] FAQ Manager
Well you can easily add the rules to the FAQ if you wish with this change so you don't need an entirely different page for it. I like to make my websites unique and informative so I always customize the FAQ, Terms of use, Privacy Policy, BBCode guide and sometimes I write additional information pag...
- Fri Apr 04, 2014 1:54 am
- Forum: [3.x][Archive] RFCs
- Topic: [RFC] Edit/Add/Remove/Move Multiple smilies
- Replies: 8
- Views: 19115
Re: [RFC] Edit/Add/Remove/Move Multiple smilies
The "delete" and "move" aren't - those are very time-saving.