Search found 50 matches
- Wed Aug 25, 2010 4:32 am
- Forum: [3.x] Rejected RFCs
- Topic: [RFC|Rejected] MODX 2.0
- Replies: 21
- Views: 44218
Re: [RFC] MODX 2.0
I really appreciate the new bridge packaging guidelines. Thanks for that!
- Wed Aug 25, 2010 4:20 am
- Forum: [3.x] Discussion
- Topic: really good idea: mod list
- Replies: 11
- Views: 18953
Re: really good idea: mod list
I assume we are moving towards a mod repository system? Perhaps several repositories, for reelased and in-development mods? install/uninstall/update via a repository list is IMO a good ultimate goal --and a wider consideration than just a list of what you have installed.
- Wed Aug 25, 2010 4:08 am
- Forum: [3.1/Ascraeus] Merged Event Requests
- Topic: [RFC] user_add hook
- Replies: 10
- Views: 44614
Re: [RFC] user_add hook
A small point, but you might want to consider "user_add" and "user_add_before" instead. I think "before" makes it clear that no changes have been written to the database yet.
- Tue Aug 24, 2010 6:50 am
- Forum: [3.x] Rejected Event Requests
- Topic: [RFC] hook_styles_output
- Replies: 1
- Views: 17096
[RFC] hook_styles_output
Name: styles_output Rationale: Generated CSS could be intercepted and modified on its way to the browser. Ideally this would happen after the CSS is generated. This could make for very flexible on-the-fly style adjustments, particularly for template integrations. I already do this in wp-united in or...
- Tue Aug 24, 2010 6:19 am
- Forum: [3.x][Archive] RFCs
- Topic: [RFC|Accepted] Cleaning up the ACP UI
- Replies: 36
- Views: 88228
Re: [RFC|Accepted] Cleaning up the ACP UI
Also, why is "authentication" under "client communication"? Shouldn't it be under "server configuration"?
- Tue Aug 24, 2010 4:23 am
- Forum: [3.1/Ascraeus] Merged RFCs
- Topic: [RFC|Merged] No db storage of stylesheets and templates
- Replies: 23
- Views: 61524
Re: [RFC|Accepted] No db storage of themes and stylesheets
This is excellent news. In addition, might I sugest that the source stylesheets be combined into a single file? The multiple CSS files do not aid in administration or editing at all -- even with Firebug or other tools, I am shooting blind when it comes to actually seeing which source file various CS...
- Tue Aug 24, 2010 4:17 am
- Forum: [3.x] Event Requests
- Topic: [RFC] user_logout hook
- Replies: 4
- Views: 13247
Re: [RFC] user_logout hook
I think the login hook might proceed conceptually quite differently -- the hook might want to return true or false to enable / disable the login, or even override the user ID parameter. However, for security reasons, a logout should probably always succeed and not be overridable. (Don't you need to ...
- Tue Aug 24, 2010 4:03 am
- Forum: [3.x][Archive] RFCs
- Topic: [RFC|Accepted] Overridable imageset and theme paths for CDNs
- Replies: 17
- Views: 77437
Re: [RFC|Accepted] Overridable imageset and theme paths for
Note that for Amazon Cloudfront (or direct from S3), the best way is to specify two CDNs -- one for when the browser supports gzip, and one for when it doesn't (as CloudFront doesn't do negotiation). There is a specific release of IE6 that doesn't report whether it supports gzip correctly, so I used...
- Mon Aug 23, 2010 9:58 am
- Forum: [3.x] Event Requests
- Topic: [RFC] profile_update hook
- Replies: 10
- Views: 31337
[RFC] profile_update hook
Name: hook_profile_update Rationale: Third-party components can be notified whenever the user updates their profile, or an admin updates a user's profile, and take actions accordingly. Placement: Currently, this needs to occur in several places: For updating after a profile change: In ucp_profile.p...
- Mon Aug 23, 2010 9:45 am
- Forum: [3.x] Event Requests
- Topic: [RFC] user_logout hook
- Replies: 4
- Views: 13247
[RFC] user_logout hook
I imagine this one is 'obvious'.. but for completeness.... Name: hook_user_logout Rationale: To log out from third-party modules or to perform additional cleanup actions on logout Placement: After phpBB logout has succeeded, in ucp.php Input arguments: The user ID of the user that was just logged ou...