Development Discussion Board

Correct, this change will also be available in 3.1.11.

Sounds good to me. I'm happy to use any tools that help improving our code quality no matter what type it is.

The template loader works fine, prosilver's template bitfield indicates that the default template should be used for bold, italic and a few others. I don't know why there's a bold template in bbcode.html, it could be the remnant of a previous iteration or it may serve as an example for other styles...

All *CPs (ACP, MCP, UCP) use the same basic module system. As part of refactoring those CPs we'll probably also have to start on refactoring the module system that enables them currently. We definitely have to separate the contents of the actual modules and the module system that runs those modules ...

I tend to agree with your thoughts. Flex layout is definitely the way to go for a future front-end style and (judging my having worked with bootstrap for a bit now) I also think that having both classes and mixins gives you better control over specific parts of the front-end.

Yes, this event should be listed in the release highlights as it was modified.

Sorry for a bit of confusion I might have caused you. While this is probably rather easy for us because we're used to it, I do understand that changing small things all over and over again is somewhat tiring. That's also why I decided to fix these last few minor issues myself and help you out with t...

Release highlights New features Check phpBB version constant against config version Support extensions in UI tests Notable changes Improved migrator - see https://www.phpbb.com/community/viewtopic.php?f=461&t=2383821 Dropped support for MySQL versions improperly implementing FULLTEXT support Users ...

Any new style should aim at supporting only supported versions. The average lifetime of a style should nowadays be longer than that of a browser version. Therefore I'm all for dropping support of IE9 & 10.

The current development version is phpBB 3.3 for new features. A transition to 4.0 would only happen if we'd completely get rid of any backward compatibility.