Search found 66 matches

by Sierron
Fri Oct 22, 2010 10:44 am
Forum: [3.x] Discussion
Topic: Reputation | may I suggest to make it built-in with phpBB
Replies: 31
Views: 17989

Re: Reputation | may I suggest to make it built-in with phpB

I think you would need one or two extra tables, but that doesn't need to alter the original phpBB3 tables (perhaps a mod could require it). But just look around if you found a mod for that. Adding one or two mods doesn't make your board incompatible to new releases of phpBB.
by Sierron
Fri Oct 22, 2010 12:30 am
Forum: [3.x] Discussion
Topic: Reputation | may I suggest to make it built-in with phpBB
Replies: 31
Views: 17989

Re: Reputation | may I suggest to make it built-in with phpB

Why would you want that? Including a feature, but not enable it by default sounds really useless. Why would it make sense to implement such a feature, if you let it sleep somewhere in the acp. :|
by Sierron
Thu Oct 21, 2010 9:09 am
Forum: [3.x] Discussion
Topic: Reputation | may I suggest to make it built-in with phpBB
Replies: 31
Views: 17989

Re: Reputation | may I suggest to make it built-in with phpB

I see that feature at many boards and I never use that feature. Repuptation is one of the useless things that many boards have. And that thanks mod is just eye candy and for the ego of the person who made the post. Nothing more.
by Sierron
Sat Sep 18, 2010 8:58 pm
Forum: [3.x] Discussion
Topic: URL Rewriting MOD
Replies: 23
Views: 15499

Re: URL Rewriting MOD

And if phpBB would get that SEO intigrated mod, many sites would need to almost rewrite everything to be compatible with the new SEO code in phpBB. I for one, don't have the time and the feeling to do this.
by Sierron
Thu Sep 16, 2010 10:52 am
Forum: [3.0/Olympus] Styling
Topic: Slide Menu
Replies: 10
Views: 19740

Re: Slide Menu

That menu is not working with Opera the latest version (10.62).
by Sierron
Wed Aug 25, 2010 11:47 am
Forum: [3.1/Ascraeus] Merged RFCs
Topic: [RFC|Accepted] Support of SQLite 3.0+
Replies: 13
Views: 20469

Re: [RFC|Accepted] Support of SQLite 3.0+

I'm also currently trying it. Nice Idea, but don't get it to work, because I don't want replace sqlite (2).

Edit: or otherwise. I see, that both things should work, but there also some things get deleted. Currently it doesn't work. I got an empty page, but I'll try to fix that.