Search found 307 matches

by Danielx64
Tue Nov 12, 2013 12:00 pm
Forum: [3.x][Archive] RFCs
Topic: Prevent multiple inclusions of jQuery UI
Replies: 37
Views: 22775

Re: Prevent multiple inclusions of jQuery UI

-1 blindly adding it to the core. jQuery is mildly expensive in terms of file size and execution when the page loads (part of its feature detection). jQuery UI is a lot more expensive to do that. If it's expensive then it shouldn't be added just because it might be used. IMO, we should just add a m...
by Danielx64
Tue Nov 12, 2013 11:58 am
Forum: [3.x][Archive] RFCs
Topic: Prevent multiple inclusions of jQuery UI
Replies: 37
Views: 22775

Re: Prevent multiple inclusions of jQuery UI

Have anyone looked at how wordpress handle it? The core check to see if it needed then include it once if required.
by Danielx64
Tue Nov 12, 2013 1:08 am
Forum: [3.x][Archive] RFCs
Topic: FAQ Manager
Replies: 45
Views: 24253

Re: [RFC] Store FAQs in Database with ACP Edit Option

After re reading the title I took it that you wanted to put every language pack but now I worked out that it just the faq. Someone wrote a rules ext for 3.1 so I suppose that one could get that and edit it.
by Danielx64
Mon Nov 11, 2013 10:57 am
Forum: [3.x][Archive] RFCs
Topic: FAQ Manager
Replies: 45
Views: 24253

Re: [RFC] Store FAQs in Database with ACP Edit Option

Also what if the database get huge? Also it may slow the board down
by Danielx64
Mon Nov 11, 2013 9:37 am
Forum: [3.x][Archive] RFCs
Topic: FAQ Manager
Replies: 45
Views: 24253

Re: [RFC] Store FAQs in Database with ACP Edit Option

How will you handle the fact that there may be more than one language pack installed?
by Danielx64
Sun Nov 10, 2013 11:03 am
Forum: [3.x][Archive] RFCs
Topic: No Link For You! (anti-spam)
Replies: 77
Views: 36021

Re: [RFC] No Link For You! (anti-spam)

Well who stupid enough to approve those nonsense posts?
by Danielx64
Sun Nov 10, 2013 4:42 am
Forum: [3.x][Archive] RFCs
Topic: No Link For You! (anti-spam)
Replies: 77
Views: 36021

Re: [RFC] No Link For You! (anti-spam)

I don't consider spammers people ;) but...it's OK if they're "people?" Again, why do you insist that 1 insufficient method is enough? Well there is several options one is changing a setting or 2 so that users in the newly registered group will need to answer a question before posting. I have not do...
by Danielx64
Sun Nov 10, 2013 4:32 am
Forum: [3.x][Archive] RFCs
Topic: No Link For You! (anti-spam)
Replies: 77
Views: 36021

Re: [RFC] No Link For You! (anti-spam)

There are better ways of dealing with this - the newly registered user group and having to approve 3 or so posts. Also making it hard for spammers to join. In all -10 from me. That works for some, not all. We've had more than one that realized that the first few posts were moderated and posted a do...
by Danielx64
Sun Nov 10, 2013 4:26 am
Forum: [3.x][Archive] RFCs
Topic: No Link For You! (anti-spam)
Replies: 77
Views: 36021

Re: [RFC] No Link For You! (anti-spam)

There are better ways of dealing with this - the newly registered user group and having to approve 3 or so posts. Also making it hard for spammers to join. In all -10 from me.
by Danielx64
Sat Nov 09, 2013 8:17 am
Forum: [3.x] Rejected RFCs
Topic: [RFC] VIP Paid Membership
Replies: 34
Views: 31689

Re: [RFC] VIP Paid Membership

We are not going to be implementing the PayPal IPN or support for the various other payment gateways into the phpBB core. Yes, it would be nice to support, but it is far outside of the scope of a bulletin board software. This would just become another external library and interface we'd be forced t...