Search found 1766 matches

by DavidIQ
Wed Dec 30, 2009 2:17 pm
Forum: [3.x] Discussion
Topic: Mobile browser support
Replies: 17
Views: 18355

Re: Mobile browser support

So you're only going to cater to the 1-5% of the world that will have a laptop-sized mobile phone in their pockets when phpBB4 rolls out? I don't think that should be the focus of the mobile browser support if it were to be added in phpBB4. It should be a simple interface without any bells and whist...
by DavidIQ
Tue Dec 29, 2009 7:15 pm
Forum: [3.x] Discussion
Topic: Älphäbet url support
Replies: 18
Views: 15155

Re: Älphäbet url support

code reader wrote:-- and btw: this looks like one of the cases where a phpbb2 patch would not be out of place also.
The only reason a phpBB2 patch would be officially released is if there is some security vuln. found and this hardly qualifies...
by DavidIQ
Wed Dec 23, 2009 3:47 pm
Forum: [3.x] Discussion
Topic: Attachment Management
Replies: 14
Views: 11267

Re: Attachment Management

my sense is that this will not be good for the quality of discussion. Agree 100% with that. #2 well, when I try to download this, it gives me the exact filename on my local computer http://area51.phpbb.com/phpBB/viewtopic.php?p=203301#p203301 So? Would you rather some random name? What benefit does...
by DavidIQ
Wed Dec 23, 2009 1:29 am
Forum: [3.x] Discussion
Topic: Attachment Management
Replies: 14
Views: 11267

Re: Attachment Management

Following the spirit of discussion... 1. Store by month instead of user_id Echoing what iWisdom said...why? What would be the purpose of that? 2. Rename each attachment Not sure you've looked at the current attachments feature but attachments are not stored with the original name. 3. Add watermark S...
by DavidIQ
Tue Dec 22, 2009 6:47 am
Forum: [3.x] Discussion
Topic: Wave Federation Protocol Integration (API)
Replies: 29
Views: 20077

Re: Wave Federation Protocol Integration (API)

Please at least try to think outside the box ;) I do try to think outside the box. But I also take into consideration Google's "excellent" track record for keeping private things private. I would like to be wrong of course but only time will tell I guess. It's a protocol not a service from Google. ...
by DavidIQ
Tue Dec 22, 2009 5:57 am
Forum: [3.x] Discussion
Topic: Wave Federation Protocol Integration (API)
Replies: 29
Views: 20077

Re: Wave Federation Protocol Integration (API)

marosell wrote:Please at least try to think outside the box ;)
I do try to think outside the box. But I also take into consideration Google's "excellent" track record for keeping private things private. I would like to be wrong of course but only time will tell I guess.
by DavidIQ
Tue Dec 22, 2009 5:39 am
Forum: [3.x] Discussion
Topic: Wave Federation Protocol Integration (API)
Replies: 29
Views: 20077

Re: Wave Federation Protocol Integration (API)

Almost sounds like a sales pitch...
marosell wrote:Please reread that sentence: Everyone could track everything they ever posted ANYWHERE on the web in their Wave Platform.
As could everyone else or maybe "Big Brother". No thanks :P
by DavidIQ
Mon Dec 21, 2009 5:23 am
Forum: [3.x] Discussion
Topic: Package Management - was: Translations / styles
Replies: 36
Views: 21947

Re: Package Management - was: Translations / styles

As it is now, MOD authors should be following our guidelines if they expect their MODs to be validated into the MODDB. I don't expect this to change with phpBB4. And you just gave another reason to show a notice/warning about the MOD/Customisation not being validated by the phpBB Team.
by DavidIQ
Sun Dec 20, 2009 9:02 pm
Forum: [3.x] Discussion
Topic: Is there going to be a package manager?
Replies: 4
Views: 4700

Re: What is this forum for?

carlino1994 wrote:In this version will be implement a manager for install automatically mods?
I think that might come sooner than 4.x but don't quote me on that. AutoMOD is as best we can do right now for the 3.0.x branch.
by DavidIQ
Wed Dec 16, 2009 8:13 pm
Forum: [3.x] Discussion
Topic: AJAX, jQuery, et. al.
Replies: 38
Views: 33632

Re: AJAX, jQuery, et. al.

ToonArmy wrote:What and write our own cross browser JS library? I think not.
Writing some functions to handle simple AJAX that are cross-browser friendly isn't that hard :P If you get into more complex events and features then adding jQuery would be the way to go of course.