Search found 219 matches

by Cap'n Refsmmat
Sat Jul 15, 2006 2:48 am
Forum: [3.0/Olympus] Discussion
Topic: This is not a support request...
Replies: 7
Views: 4228

Re: This is not a support request...

As the title says, this may sound like a support question, but it's not. What does this mean... Warning The DEBUG_EXTRA constant is defined which is only meant for development purposes by the developers. The board is running additional code to display sql reports, which slows down the board in a si...
by Cap'n Refsmmat
Sat Jul 15, 2006 2:47 am
Forum: [3.0/Olympus] Discussion
Topic: Community moderation
Replies: 66
Views: 34688

Re: Community moderation

Take a peek at Digg. People who are disagreed with get moderated down, even when they didn't really say anything wrong.
by Cap'n Refsmmat
Thu Jul 13, 2006 3:35 pm
Forum: [3.0/Olympus] Discussion
Topic: Jabber Settings
Replies: 5
Views: 3930

Re: Jabber Settings

Ideally the admin could tell phpBB to sign up with the AIM transports and such, and phpBB would then send the users AIM messages as well... perhaps 3.2.
by Cap'n Refsmmat
Wed Jul 12, 2006 9:22 pm
Forum: [3.0/Olympus] Discussion
Topic: Jabber Settings
Replies: 5
Views: 3930

Re: Jabber Settings

It goes to the Jabber account specified by each user. If they receive a PM and they set a Jabber account, they get a message on Jabber.
by Cap'n Refsmmat
Tue Jul 11, 2006 7:26 pm
Forum: [3.0/Olympus] New features discussion
Topic: session_ stored variables
Replies: 3
Views: 2287

Re: session_ stored variables

korkakak wrote: I think that this is not exactly accurate with the massive usage of append_sid function over almost every url (urls that don't have the sid are just a pain in the a$$ inside the system)

append_sid() doesn't append anything if it doesn't need to.
by Cap'n Refsmmat
Tue Jul 11, 2006 5:42 pm
Forum: [3.0/Olympus] New features discussion
Topic: session_ stored variables
Replies: 3
Views: 2287

Re: session_ stored variables

Session IDs are only viewable if the client doesn't support cookies (the sid part of the URL is only used before the forum can determine if they do support cookies).
by Cap'n Refsmmat
Mon Jul 10, 2006 9:51 pm
Forum: [3.0/Olympus] Styling
Topic: Signatures improvement
Replies: 26
Views: 14478

Re: Signatures improvement

Lastof wrote: Couldn't that bit just, well, vanish? I don't think anthing is ever put in it, so it might look better without it.

Or that might look worse.

Someone should test it (I'm feeling terminally lazy right now).

It was originally for the "Back to top" link I believe.
by Cap'n Refsmmat
Mon Jul 10, 2006 8:02 pm
Forum: [3.0/Olympus] Styling
Topic: Signatures improvement
Replies: 26
Views: 14478

Re: Signatures improvement

Yep.

(Rowspan+1, by the way... but what if they don't have a signature? Need another <!-- IF --> block then.)
by Cap'n Refsmmat
Mon Jul 10, 2006 8:01 pm
Forum: [3.0/Olympus] Discussion
Topic: Why Cant We Say What We Want?
Replies: 9
Views: 6125

Re: Why Cant We Say What We Want?

morbidpaloza wrote: True BUT by seeing the beta it gives people tonz of new ideas for features

But if those features were added, there'd have to be more and more betas, and phpBB3 would never be finished.
by Cap'n Refsmmat
Mon Jul 10, 2006 5:12 pm
Forum: [3.0/Olympus] Styling
Topic: Signatures improvement
Replies: 26
Views: 14478

Re: Signatures improvement

This just looks weird with the spare cell on the left. Perhaps increase the vertical size of that so it is as tall as the signature?