Search found 1177 matches

by naderman
Thu Nov 21, 2013 1:17 pm
Forum: [3.x] Discussion
Topic: phpBB 3.1 Alpha2 Preview Release
Replies: 10
Views: 8980

phpBB 3.1 Alpha2 Preview Release

Please see our blog post for the release announcement at https://blog.phpbb.com/2013/11/21/phpbb ... w-release/
by naderman
Mon Nov 04, 2013 5:38 am
Forum: [3.1/Ascraeus] Merged RFCs
Topic: Rename "purge" to "uninstall", differentiate between "install" and "enable"
Replies: 23
Views: 19319

Re: Rename "purge" to "uninstall", differentiate between "install" and "enable"

There is no installation at all. After you upload files you can enable and disable the extension. We will not introduce the concept of an installation process simply because some people are used to it from Windows applications.
by naderman
Sat Nov 02, 2013 10:14 pm
Forum: [3.x] Discussion
Topic: Update process for extensions
Replies: 51
Views: 26726

Re: Update process for extensions

After some more discussion we are back to what nathan proposed in the first post :)
by naderman
Sat Nov 02, 2013 10:03 pm
Forum: [3.x] Discussion
Topic: Update process for extensions
Replies: 51
Views: 26726

Re: Update process for extensions

Resulting from a discussion on IRC of how extension updates should work: Optional: Admin clicks update button in ACP for an extension and is informed that he should upload the new files for the respective extension, maybe also some info on current version and where it is available etc. Admin overwri...
by naderman
Sat Nov 02, 2013 9:16 pm
Forum: [3.1/Ascraeus] Merged RFCs
Topic: Rename "purge" to "uninstall", differentiate between "install" and "enable"
Replies: 23
Views: 19319

Re: Rename "purge" to "uninstall", differentiate between "install" and "enable"

I think that two actions doing the same thing should be called the same thing, hence I decided to only have "enable" and no separate "install" process. I also explicitly decided to use "purge" rather than "uninstall" because "uninstall" is ambiguous as to whether it will delete generated data from t...
by naderman
Mon Oct 28, 2013 7:09 pm
Forum: [3.x] Rejected RFCs
Topic: [RFC] Password hashing in own class
Replies: 7
Views: 13582

Re: [RFC] Password hashing in own class

We are replacing password hashing with a patch based on the proposal [RFC]More secure password hashing, which also refactors the related code, so I'm moving this one to rejected RFCs.
by naderman
Mon Oct 28, 2013 7:09 pm
Forum: [3.x] Rejected RFCs
Topic: [RFC] Use password_hash
Replies: 14
Views: 25415

Re: [RFC] Use password_hash

We are replacing password hashing with a patch based on the proposal [RFC]More secure password hashing, so I'm moving this one to rejected RFCs.
by naderman
Mon Oct 28, 2013 7:04 pm
Forum: [3.1/Ascraeus] Merged RFCs
Topic: [RFC] Make icons clickable
Replies: 27
Views: 22917

Re: [RFC] Make icons clickable

This is the case for private messages and notifications now since the responsive design changes, should probably be implemented for the other icons too.
by naderman
Mon Oct 28, 2013 7:04 pm
Forum: [3.1/Ascraeus] Merged RFCs
Topic: [RFC] Make icons clickable
Replies: 27
Views: 22917

Re: [RFC] Make icons clickable

Merged the two topics.