Search found 153 matches

by CHItA
Wed May 02, 2018 11:05 am
Forum: [3.x] Style Development
Topic: [NEW THEME] 4. JS frameworks & approach
Replies: 33
Views: 5199

Re: [NEW THEME] 4. JS frameworks & approach

Okay, seems reasonable, however, if vue can do what jQuery can then we could just use that, basically to only use as many libraries that we actually do need (so if Vue could replace jQuery then we could just write everything in Vue).
by CHItA
Wed May 02, 2018 6:29 am
Forum: [3.x] Style Development
Topic: [NEW THEME] 4. JS frameworks & approach
Replies: 33
Views: 5199

Re: [NEW THEME] 4. JS frameworks & approach

My point is that as far as I know, we only use jQuery to toggle classes and select elements. Not super sure about this, so I might be wrong, however, basically all the browsers we want to support should support JS features that would make it simple to do this (e.g. they have querySelector etc). Vue ...
by CHItA
Tue May 01, 2018 10:33 pm
Forum: [3.x] Style Development
Topic: [NEW THEME] 4. JS frameworks & approach
Replies: 33
Views: 5199

Re: [NEW THEME] 4. JS frameworks & approach

I would vote for droping jQuery, and using pure JS instead (basically jQuery shouldn't really have anything anymore that is harder to do in pure JS). For the more complicated stuff we could use Vue if there is a need for it.
by CHItA
Tue May 01, 2018 5:11 pm
Forum: [3.x] Discussion
Topic: EU-DSGVO or GDPR Aspects on Development
Replies: 13
Views: 1914

Re: EU-DSGVO or GDPR Aspects on Development

However: It may be , that DSGVO suggests or forces us to have the cookies as "opt in" . As you guys have cookie consent from Insites implemented, and they have also an opt-in option: Is it planned to implement this function? And, of course, if the user is not accepting cookies, to block all cookies...
by CHItA
Sun Mar 11, 2018 9:17 pm
Forum: General Development Discussion
Topic: [GSoC] Database Explorer within ACP
Replies: 6
Views: 1218

Re: [GSoC] Database Explorer within ACP

I don't see this to be a good idea for phpBB. phpMyAdmin is whole project dedicated to do just that and only for MySQL. This would be just too much of a hassle to maintain, and honestly I don't really see this being widely used as you describe it. IMO most admins would just use it as a replacement o...
by CHItA
Fri Mar 02, 2018 8:47 pm
Forum: [3.x] Tickets Discussion
Topic: PHPBB3-10418 - WYSIWYG Editor/Rich Text Editor
Replies: 460
Views: 301240

Re: PHPBB3-10418 - WYSIWYG Editor/Rich Text Editor

pell is not an editor, calling it a library would still be a huge overstatement.
by CHItA
Sat Feb 17, 2018 10:00 pm
Forum: General Development Discussion
Topic: [GSOC 2018] Revamp PM system to chat based
Replies: 26
Views: 4836

Re: [GSOC 2018] Revamp PM system to chat based

Derk's username is Derky, and I'm Máté. You can find all usernames here . The mentor allocation for projects may change, as we plan to have at least two mentors for each project, and also one mentor shouldn't have too many students, so in general it is best to keep all conversations public, unless y...
by CHItA
Sat Feb 17, 2018 9:36 am
Forum: General Development Discussion
Topic: [GSOC 2018] Revamp PM system to chat based
Replies: 26
Views: 4836

Re: [GSOC 2018] Revamp PM system to chat based

Keep in mind, that you're free to propose any implementation (as you are also free to propose your own idea as well). Thus everything you read here is more of a suggestion than a requirement.
by CHItA
Mon Feb 12, 2018 5:40 pm
Forum: General Development Discussion
Topic: Why does Travis fail?
Replies: 9
Views: 2096

Re: Why does Travis fail?

It depends which git client you use, the search term i would suggest is "Squash commits". I use the command line, so if you issue git commands from your console, then you want to rebase with the -i switch, and then just write an f for your second commit, and it will be merged into the first one. You...
by CHItA
Mon Feb 12, 2018 11:26 am
Forum: General Development Discussion
Topic: Why does Travis fail?
Replies: 9
Views: 2096

Re: Why does Travis fail?

It failed because your merge commit doesn't follow the commit message format.