Search found 11 matches
- Tue Nov 30, 2010 4:09 am
- Forum: [3.x] Rejected RFCs
- Topic: [RFC|Rejected] Removal of subsilver2
- Replies: 238
- Views: 445321
Re: [RFC|Accepted] Removal of subsilver2
Thanks DavidIQ, I must have missed that while reading though!
- Tue Nov 30, 2010 3:36 am
- Forum: [3.x] Rejected RFCs
- Topic: [RFC|Rejected] Removal of subsilver2
- Replies: 238
- Views: 445321
Question
Now that in 3.1 Subsilver2 won't be shipped will it still be updated and will style updates still be released like they currently are? What I mean is will the style updates still be released?
- Fri Oct 08, 2010 11:30 pm
- Forum: [3.x][Archive] RFCs
- Topic: [RFC] Infractions System
- Replies: 4
- Views: 14783
Re: [RFC] Infractions System
I couldn't agree more. This needs to be added and I really hope it is. The Warning system is so primitive and the few MODs that relate to the warning system are not that helpful. There should be a much more intricate system developed.
- Mon Sep 20, 2010 11:08 pm
- Forum: [3.x][Archive] RFCs
- Topic: [RFC] Beter warning system
- Replies: 7
- Views: 15840
Re: [RFC] Beter warning system
Sounds good. Anything more advanced than the current one would be amazing .Nelsaidi wrote:I will hopefully try and make a mod for an improved warning system, hopefully could then be included in 3.2 .
- Thu Sep 09, 2010 10:39 pm
- Forum: [3.x][Archive] RFCs
- Topic: [RFC] Beter warning system
- Replies: 7
- Views: 15840
Re: [RFC] Better* warning system
I agree as I mentioned in that post. I really think there should be a bit more advanced warning system. I like that there are some ' Ban after X warnings " MODs and " Warning Reasons " which totally could be useful to many people. I would love to see an infraction system similar to vB...
- Tue Jul 27, 2010 1:47 am
- Forum: [3.x] Rejected RFCs
- Topic: [RFC|Rejected] Removal of subsilver2
- Replies: 238
- Views: 445321
Re: [RFC|Accepted] Removal of subsilver2
Okay, thanks for the information .A_Jelly_Doughnut wrote:Yes, slower as in the forum loads more slowly.
- Tue Jul 27, 2010 1:45 am
- Forum: [3.x] Rejected RFCs
- Topic: [RFC|Rejected] Removal of subsilver2
- Replies: 238
- Views: 445321
Re: [RFC|Accepted] Removal of subsilver2
I hate to sound like a dolt but slow in what way? Like when you use the style your forum loads slower? Or development is slow?naderman wrote:It was a hypothetical example. Some people complained about prosilver being slow.
- Tue Jul 27, 2010 1:37 am
- Forum: [3.x] Rejected RFCs
- Topic: [RFC|Rejected] Removal of subsilver2
- Replies: 238
- Views: 445321
Re: [RFC|Accepted] Removal of subsilver2
It is very relevant. If everyone using subsilver2 is just waiting for a faster prosilver. Then maybe we should drop subsilver2 and make prosilver faster and everyone will be happy. Just because a majority uses something now, doesn't mean that it has to stay. Hello, When you say "Faster" w...
- Mon Jul 19, 2010 4:10 am
- Forum: [3.x] Discussion
- Topic: beter warning systeem(Warning groups..)
- Replies: 15
- Views: 28493
Re: beter warning systeem(Warning groups..)
I agree with your suggestion. I think the vB system is set up very well and having something similar to it with a built in automatic ban function is fine. I know people say "you don't need this if you have a good community or good management over the board" but if you are running a forum b...
- Tue Jun 15, 2010 2:29 am
- Forum: [3.x] Discussion
- Topic: [Suggestion] "Soft Delete Function"
- Replies: 5
- Views: 10770
Re: [Suggestion] "Soft Delete Function"
Hello,
Edited: Sorry I've not been here long and wasn't sure what the procedure was...
Edited: Sorry I've not been here long and wasn't sure what the procedure was...