Search found 11 matches

by Christy
Tue Nov 30, 2010 4:09 am
Forum: [3.x] Rejected RFCs
Topic: [RFC|Rejected] Removal of subsilver2
Replies: 238
Views: 211581

Re: [RFC|Accepted] Removal of subsilver2

Thanks DavidIQ, I must have missed that while reading though!
by Christy
Tue Nov 30, 2010 3:36 am
Forum: [3.x] Rejected RFCs
Topic: [RFC|Rejected] Removal of subsilver2
Replies: 238
Views: 211581

Question

Now that in 3.1 Subsilver2 won't be shipped will it still be updated and will style updates still be released like they currently are? What I mean is will the style updates still be released?
by Christy
Fri Oct 08, 2010 11:30 pm
Forum: [3.x][Archive] RFCs
Topic: [RFC] Infractions System
Replies: 4
Views: 6501

Re: [RFC] Infractions System

I couldn't agree more. This needs to be added and I really hope it is. The Warning system is so primitive and the few MODs that relate to the warning system are not that helpful. There should be a much more intricate system developed.
by Christy
Mon Sep 20, 2010 11:08 pm
Forum: [3.x][Archive] RFCs
Topic: [RFC] Beter warning system
Replies: 7
Views: 8481

Re: [RFC] Beter warning system

Nelsaidi wrote:I will hopefully try and make a mod for an improved warning system, hopefully could then be included in 3.2 .
Sounds good. Anything more advanced than the current one would be amazing :).
by Christy
Thu Sep 09, 2010 10:39 pm
Forum: [3.x][Archive] RFCs
Topic: [RFC] Beter warning system
Replies: 7
Views: 8481

Re: [RFC] Better* warning system

I agree as I mentioned in that post. I really think there should be a bit more advanced warning system. I like that there are some ' Ban after X warnings " MODs and " Warning Reasons " which totally could be useful to many people. I would love to see an infraction system similar to vB but that isn't...
by Christy
Tue Jul 27, 2010 1:47 am
Forum: [3.x] Rejected RFCs
Topic: [RFC|Rejected] Removal of subsilver2
Replies: 238
Views: 211581

Re: [RFC|Accepted] Removal of subsilver2

A_Jelly_Doughnut wrote:Yes, slower as in the forum loads more slowly.
Okay, thanks for the information :).
by Christy
Tue Jul 27, 2010 1:45 am
Forum: [3.x] Rejected RFCs
Topic: [RFC|Rejected] Removal of subsilver2
Replies: 238
Views: 211581

Re: [RFC|Accepted] Removal of subsilver2

naderman wrote:It was a hypothetical example. Some people complained about prosilver being slow.
I hate to sound like a dolt but slow in what way? Like when you use the style your forum loads slower? Or development is slow?
by Christy
Tue Jul 27, 2010 1:37 am
Forum: [3.x] Rejected RFCs
Topic: [RFC|Rejected] Removal of subsilver2
Replies: 238
Views: 211581

Re: [RFC|Accepted] Removal of subsilver2

It is very relevant. If everyone using subsilver2 is just waiting for a faster prosilver. Then maybe we should drop subsilver2 and make prosilver faster and everyone will be happy. Just because a majority uses something now, doesn't mean that it has to stay. Hello, When you say "Faster" what exactl...
by Christy
Mon Jul 19, 2010 4:10 am
Forum: [3.x] Discussion
Topic: beter warning systeem(Warning groups..)
Replies: 15
Views: 15411

Re: beter warning systeem(Warning groups..)

I agree with your suggestion. I think the vB system is set up very well and having something similar to it with a built in automatic ban function is fine. I know people say "you don't need this if you have a good community or good management over the board" but if you are running a forum based on a ...
by Christy
Tue Jun 15, 2010 2:29 am
Forum: [3.x] Discussion
Topic: [Suggestion] "Soft Delete Function"
Replies: 5
Views: 5657

Re: [Suggestion] "Soft Delete Function"

Hello,

Edited: Sorry I've not been here long and wasn't sure what the procedure was...