Search found 32 matches

by FeyFre
Tue Sep 04, 2012 6:54 pm
Forum: [3.x] Rejected RFCs
Topic: [Rejected] Removal of subsilver2 in 3.1
Replies: 75
Views: 73728

Re: [Rejected] Removal of subsilver2 in 3.1

The current standard of HTML5 states that tables are not for page formatting, that's what we are doing, get rid of page formatting using tables. So the same states HTML 4. "Tables for holding data". Forum messages is data. Any doubts? So each message is row of table(by accident the same we can say ...
by FeyFre
Tue Sep 04, 2012 12:01 pm
Forum: [3.x] Rejected RFCs
Topic: [Rejected] Removal of subsilver2 in 3.1
Replies: 75
Views: 73728

Re: Removal of subsilver2 in 3.1

I'm who against of removal of ss2. If anybody finds my message a bit offensive - probably it is so(c). I'd like to bump this old topic in order to persuade developers to reconsider removing subsilver2. Reasons to remove it: Subsilver was great style for its time, but web moved forward since then. Ta...
by FeyFre
Sat Nov 20, 2010 5:40 pm
Forum: Chit Chat
Topic: Brocken subscriber notification.
Replies: 3
Views: 4616

Re: Brocken subscriber notification.

Today I have received another three letters with from header
From: narqelion <>
and they was treated as spam by antispam system. Please, fix this(or force narqelion to use bugless mail client).
by FeyFre
Sun Nov 07, 2010 11:54 am
Forum: Chit Chat
Topic: Brocken subscriber notification.
Replies: 3
Views: 4616

Brocken subscriber notification.

Hello I am subscribed Commit Mailinglist ticket notifications etc Some day ago I got e-mails with "Unknown sender" which is treated by my gmail and some other mail provides I used to receive this notification as spam(or something like) message. Here their message headers: Delivered-To: *cutted*@gmai...
by FeyFre
Thu Sep 02, 2010 5:32 pm
Forum: [3.0/Olympus] Styling
Topic: [prosilver] Forum and topic listing using tables
Replies: 10
Views: 21787

Re: [prosilver] Forum and topic listing using tables

onehundredandtwo, if you want tables as data container use subsilver2. But since phpbb team officially abandoned development of ss2, we probably should forget about tables at all.
by FeyFre
Sat Aug 07, 2010 11:27 pm
Forum: [3.x] Rejected RFCs
Topic: [RFC|Rejected] Removal of subsilver2
Replies: 238
Views: 150714

Re: [RFC|Accepted] Removal of subsilver2

Wait, did you just disagree without bothering to figure out what you disagreed with? Seriously? You can't even be bothered to read the posts in this forum? You don't know what the question is but your answer is "NO"? If you don't want to participate in forming compromises just go elsewhere, this co...
by FeyFre
Sat Aug 07, 2010 5:05 pm
Forum: [3.x] Rejected RFCs
Topic: [RFC|Rejected] Removal of subsilver2
Replies: 238
Views: 150714

Re: [RFC|Accepted] Removal of subsilver2

naderman wrote:So can I assume that those who spoke out against removing subsilver2 can live with this alternative proposed solution?
Which one?

Never mind. The answer will probably NO.
by FeyFre
Thu Jul 29, 2010 9:10 pm
Forum: [3.x] Rejected RFCs
Topic: [RFC|Rejected] Removal of subsilver2
Replies: 238
Views: 150714

Re: [RFC|Accepted] Removal of subsilver2

create subsilver3 based on prosilver, get those users who currently prefer subsilver to move to subsilver3 and then drop current subsilver. Do you really think SS3 will be as good as SS2, especially when it will be based on prosilver? Will it fulfil all requirements of users who choose SS2? I have ...
by FeyFre
Wed Jul 28, 2010 7:45 pm
Forum: [3.x] Rejected RFCs
Topic: [RFC|Rejected] Removal of subsilver2
Replies: 238
Views: 150714

Re: [RFC|Accepted] Removal of subsilver2

That would give the community and the team at least a year to: - "fix" prosilver speed and usability (css clean-up) - time for style authors to update their styles on a prosilver base (or on the base of a possible community SS2) - the community to realease a community stupported version of SS2 if w...
by FeyFre
Sat Jul 24, 2010 8:37 pm
Forum: [3.x] Discussion
Topic: [Patch] Direct (php-less) attachment downloads
Replies: 26
Views: 22152

Re: [RFC|Accepted] Resuming for attachments / HTTP range sup

DavidIQ wrote:*cough*[/size]
Wki is not a source of objective data. I believe what I can touch and all web-servers I have touched was on Linux. That is my objective statistics.