Search found 122 matches

by Nelsaidi
Thu Jan 20, 2011 5:33 pm
Forum: [3.x][Archive] RFCs
Topic: [RFC]Topic System
Replies: 13
Views: 26960

Re: [RFC]Topic System

The fact every browser has plugins for such a thing is a reason not too, implementing it means you have to deal with providing right spelling (not easy or even free), for every language. Spell checking is something a user does themselves if they want.
by Nelsaidi
Sat Dec 18, 2010 1:29 pm
Forum: [3.x][Archive] RFCs
Topic: [RFC] MediaWiki-like Diff Engine for Posts
Replies: 5
Views: 18583

Re: [RFC] MediaWiki-like Diff Engine for Posts

Soft delete will be included in phpBB3.1 (which is basically delete a topic but its simply hidden, then a hard delete permisions to permanently remove it)

It does sound good and is useful, if automatically deleted after X days then database size increases could be managed.
by Nelsaidi
Wed Dec 15, 2010 8:15 pm
Forum: [3.x] Discussion
Topic: WYSIWYG editor
Replies: 104
Views: 223401

Re: WYSIWYG editor

Not trying to be rude or anything, but you didnt make the WYSIWYG editor (the tinyMCE team did) you simply implemented it into phpBB, and I'm pretty sure the phpBB team too could have done it in 3 weeks if they wanted to - but software development has abit more to it that "ok lets do this"...
by Nelsaidi
Fri Dec 10, 2010 7:00 pm
Forum: [3.x] Discussion
Topic: WYSIWYG editor
Replies: 104
Views: 223401

Re: WYSIWYG editor

My post was you wont submit it because its not you who made it, but whatever

Regardless as to whoever made it ...
it is prone to XSS and you allow pretty much unfiltered HTML to be posted.
by Nelsaidi
Fri Dec 10, 2010 4:25 pm
Forum: [3.x] Discussion
Topic: WYSIWYG editor
Replies: 104
Views: 223401

Re: WYSIWYG editor

finally my work is done. i complete my project means: Tinymce WYSIWYG for phpBB its working very good with phpBB 3.0.8. for some reason i dont want to publish in phpbb.com but i can give it to development team if wants to add in phpBB ( 3.1 or 3.2 ). :D http://startrekguide.com/community/viewtopic....
by Nelsaidi
Mon Nov 22, 2010 11:22 pm
Forum: [3.x][Archive] RFCs
Topic: [RFC] Infractions System
Replies: 4
Views: 14373

Re: [RFC] Infractions System

I've started work on this as a mod, I'll keep this thread/the SVN updated as progress goes along, and if I have to stop for whatever reasons. - I'll put any notes/outcomes of research also on the SVN (link coming soon)
by Nelsaidi
Tue Nov 02, 2010 5:38 pm
Forum: [3.x] Discussion
Topic: Sub-Sub-Sub forums and Categories like CH for phpbb2
Replies: 5
Views: 12395

Re: Sub-Sub-Sub forums and Categories like CH for phpbb2

The only thing I'm not too happy about is: Assume forum structure Forum A -> Subforum B If user has view permisions for subforum B but not forum A, then the only way they can access it is via a direct link This does make permissions abit more of a hassle, the only issue is showing that a forum exist...
by Nelsaidi
Sun Oct 31, 2010 11:43 am
Forum: [3.x][Archive] RFCs
Topic: [RFC] Autosave
Replies: 28
Views: 49741

Re: [RFC] Autosave

I remember a post about using local storage - RFC somewhere, had some good points about autosaving, how it would work, downsides, etc etc. An outcome of that I remember was that if the post didnt submit due to server error, chances are it wouldnt have saved a draft either. My reasoning for saying da...
by Nelsaidi
Fri Oct 29, 2010 7:45 pm
Forum: [3.x][Archive] RFCs
Topic: [RFC] Autosave
Replies: 28
Views: 49741

Re: [RFC] Autosave

It would put an immense load on the database and the server, it is better suited as a mod for boards who need it and have the computing power to serve it.