Search found 84 matches
- Wed Apr 15, 2009 7:58 pm
- Forum: [3.0/Olympus] New features discussion
- Topic: Again about Attachments Management
- Replies: 3
- Views: 11065
Re: Again about Attachments Management
I think the thought was that group-based permissions would be a better solution. This is not the point: with this method (if I understand correctly) you may give permission to upload, or not give it. Only certain groups may upload, some other no. Often you need to garantee a full permission, (high ...
- Sun Apr 12, 2009 5:58 pm
- Forum: [3.0/Olympus] New features discussion
- Topic: Again about Attachments Management
- Replies: 3
- Views: 11065
Again about Attachments Management
Recently we decided to open our Board where also registred users may upload an attachment. My question is, why attachment management is only made in a generic way, and cannot be limited according to the rank of the User? I mean, an Admin, may have no limitation (for example). A common Registered Use...
- Sun Dec 09, 2007 9:38 am
- Forum: [3.0/Olympus] New features discussion
- Topic: Forum Permissions - I just cant comprehend!!!
- Replies: 27
- Views: 68909
Re: Forum Permissions - I just cant comprehend!!!
[...] Here i have to admit i intend to add an indicator for the first case to let the admin know which case is true (no permissions assigned/all set to NO or individual permissions assigned). I would suggest to Acyd , and all people which are inside the development, to make really something for the...
- Sat Oct 27, 2007 8:05 am
- Forum: [3.0/Olympus] New features discussion
- Topic: URL BBcode
- Replies: 16
- Views: 48863
Re: URL BBcode
[...] I still believe that a "Target" to supplement the "URL" would be very useful. ;) I think the same! But I also think that possibly one can define a Customer BBCode with a Target working in this way: If the target is defined, well: use it If the target is NOT reported, Ok, p...
- Thu Aug 02, 2007 6:10 pm
- Forum: [3.0/Olympus] Discussion
- Topic: Troubles with RC4 release?
- Replies: 10
- Views: 15231
Re: Troubles with RC4 release?
[...] I had a similar issue but I had couple of MODs running on the board and somehow messed up the session starting bit. But once I uploaded clean set of files, the problem was gone. I have a suspicion. :P Possibly the initial release had a corrupted file inside. If they understood this, probably ...
- Thu Aug 02, 2007 3:26 pm
- Forum: [3.0/Olympus] Discussion
- Topic: Troubles with RC4 release?
- Replies: 10
- Views: 15231
Re: Troubles with RC4 release?
I cannot uderstand (my fault, of course) this type of answer from the developers. In the ticket http://www.phpbb.com:80/bugs/phpbb3/ticket.php?ticket_id=13939 the replay is Support Request . What is the meaning of this? In the Support forum I have seen many requests with this problem, and no technic...
- Thu Aug 02, 2007 3:08 pm
- Forum: [3.0/Olympus] Discussion
- Topic: Troubles with RC4 release?
- Replies: 10
- Views: 15231
Re: Troubles with RC4 release?
I've done, but I have the suspicion to be returned with a support request by the developers. :roll: I'm thinking that also from the install I had troubles: uploaded the Changed Files Only archive for RC4 upgrade, and pointing the browser to mysite/install I could not see any method (button, or link)...
- Thu Aug 02, 2007 2:50 pm
- Forum: [3.0/Olympus] Discussion
- Topic: Troubles with RC4 release?
- Replies: 10
- Views: 15231
Re: Troubles with RC4 release?
I will do: thanks Highway
- Thu Aug 02, 2007 2:44 pm
- Forum: [3.0/Olympus] Discussion
- Topic: Troubles with RC4 release?
- Replies: 10
- Views: 15231
Troubles with RC4 release?
I have had problems upgrading to RC4, and un the support forum is all a woa and despair: all peole get a blank page after the upgrade, in a way, or another. I used the Changed Files Only formula upgrading from RC2 to RC4 (I lost the RC3 phase :roll: ). Now I discovered that using an index.php file f...
- Fri Jun 15, 2007 11:09 am
- Forum: [3.0/Olympus] Discussion
- Topic: Simulating User's surfing
- Replies: 1
- Views: 4702
Simulating User's surfing
After th RC1 I find some lack in what I remember: possibly the prosilver style may be a problem, but possibly something changed: I remember a feature (in previous Betas) where the Admin had the possibility to browse what a User had access to. Very useful, to be sure of permissions set. Is this featu...